2004
DOI: 10.1002/marc.200400119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partially Sulfonated Polystyrene and Poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide) Blend Membranes for Fuel Cells

Abstract: Summary: Based on Flory–Huggins parameters (χ), the miscibility and the effect of morphological change on proton conductivity and methanol permeability of partially sulfonated polystyrene (SPS) and partially sulfonated poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide) (SPPO), having an identical ion exchange capacity, were investigated. When 50 wt.‐% of SPPO was blended, both the proton conductivity and methanol permeability had the highest values, which resulted from the change of amorphous domains and the hydrogen bond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect became more pronounced with the increase in the SA concentration. This can be explained by the fact that the randomness of the amorphous phase in the membranes is increased by either the increase of sulfonic acid groups or the crosslinking degree, which gives rise to a perturbation of long-ranged spacing between the chains [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect became more pronounced with the increase in the SA concentration. This can be explained by the fact that the randomness of the amorphous phase in the membranes is increased by either the increase of sulfonic acid groups or the crosslinking degree, which gives rise to a perturbation of long-ranged spacing between the chains [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One attractive class of alternatives for Nafion ® is sulfonated high performance condensation polymers, including poly(arylene ether ketones) [2][3][4][5], poly(arylene ether) [6,7], poly(arylene ether sulfones) [8][9][10], and polyimides [11][12][13][14]. These polymers were prepared from both direct polymerization of sulfonated monomers and post-sulfonation on polymer chains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be explained by the fact that the randomness of the amorphous phase in graft copolymer is enhanced by introducing grafting side chains, which gives rise to a perturbation of longranged spacing between the chains. 43 Upon the introduction of TEOS and hydrolysis in an acidic condition (Figure 4(c)), the relative intensity of crystalline peak at 20.0 o was further decreased, indicating more structureless amorphous morphology of nanocomposite membranes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%