2009 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems 2009
DOI: 10.1109/btas.2009.5339019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial matching of interpose 3D facial data for face recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
36
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in almost any application that requires processing of 3D facial data, an initial registration, based on the landmark points' correspondence, is necessary in order to make a system fully automatic [1], [2]. The landmark detector must be pose invariant in order to allow the registration of both frontal and side facial scans [3], [4], [2], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in almost any application that requires processing of 3D facial data, an initial registration, based on the landmark points' correspondence, is necessary in order to make a system fully automatic [1], [2]. The landmark detector must be pose invariant in order to allow the registration of both frontal and side facial scans [3], [4], [2], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the existing works on 3D facial landmarking, 3D facial landmarks are estimated by computing the 3D shape-related feature, including shape index [14,15,34], effective energy [16], Gabor filter [17,18], local gradient [35] and curvature feature [36]. However, the accuracy on these prominent landmarks decreases drastically, including nose tip and the corner of eyes.…”
Section: Facial Landmarking On 3d Facial Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nair and Cavallaro [21] study 3D facial landmarking by building a statistical model to estimate landmarks coarsely, and then heuristics are applied to refine the locations. Perakis et al [14,15] study landmarking on 3D facial data under much more challenging conditions, such as the missing data caused by self occlusion. Zhao et al [20] proposed another method based on statistical models, who presented a model which take the both the relationship between each landmark and the local properties around each landmark into account.…”
Section: Facial Landmarking On 3d Facial Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There has been some work in localizing landmarks using only 3D data, but they do not tackle facial expressions directly. For instance, the landmark set detected by Perakis et al [71] lacks some key points for the purpose of FER and Nair and Cavallaro [72] do not consider the landmarks in the mouth region at all. In fact, most of the automatic approaches make use of the associated 2D texture image or video frames for landmark detection ( [36], [19], [20]).…”
Section: B Algorithm Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%