2014
DOI: 10.2514/1.61416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial Integrated Guidance and Control of Interceptors for High-Speed Ballistic Targets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…b max = 0.0579 is estimated by using (51). Let cos γ = 1 and ε = 10 in (17), we can get the minimum speed v min = 177.8 m/s by computing (17) and (18). Using (15) and (16) …”
Section: Speed Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…b max = 0.0579 is estimated by using (51). Let cos γ = 1 and ε = 10 in (17), we can get the minimum speed v min = 177.8 m/s by computing (17) and (18). Using (15) and (16) …”
Section: Speed Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing control methods for these problems are mainly based on the experience database [4] or numerical solution method [8] to determine the initial control inputs. In [6,17,28], the ballistic control problems are studied by incorporating continuous control inputs throughout the flying process. Such methods are inapplicable since the control inputs are only the initial states of the projectile in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the feedback linearization, IGC was transformed into the trajectory optimization of finite-time linear quadratic form [11], [12], with the numerical solution of Riccati equation developed in [13]. In [1], [14], and [15], a robust partial IGC (PIGC) design was proposed. In the PIGC method, both the outer and inner loops were designed to preserve the philosophical benefits of both IGC and conventional separated design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, note that the outermost loop of a classical three-loop guidance then control formulation is eliminated here, thereby retaining a very important advantage of IGC, namely, the minimization of the overall settling time. For further details of the PIGC philosophy, one can refer to [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%