2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0047-259x(02)00027-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial autocorrelation functions of the fractional ARIMA processes with negative degree of differencing

Abstract: Let {Xn : ∈Z} be a fractional ARIMA(p,d,q) process with partial autocorrelation function α(·). In this paper, we prove that if d∈(−1/2,0) then |α(n)|~|d|/n as n→∞. This extends the previous result for the case 0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This last theorem as well as Theorem 2.3 is an improvement of earlier work [24][25][26] for long-memory or FARIMA processes, asserting that…”
Section: Theorem 24 Let P Q ∈ N ∪ {0} and D ∈mentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This last theorem as well as Theorem 2.3 is an improvement of earlier work [24][25][26] for long-memory or FARIMA processes, asserting that…”
Section: Theorem 24 Let P Q ∈ N ∪ {0} and D ∈mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In a number of the specific examples of processes with long memory we treat, here and in [24][25][26], we observe behaviour of the form α n ∼ d/n (n → ∞) (d/n) (by the representation of α n , we are able to improve the estimate of this type in [24][25][26], where only |α n | was considered-we were unable to determine its sign). In (d/n), and throughout the paper, a n ∼ b n as n → ∞ means lim n→∞ a n /b n = 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The above type of method was used in [8] in a simpler framework, i.e., that of discrete-time stationary processes, to obtain a representation of mean-squared prediction error. See [9] and [10] for subsequent results in the same framework. Now, unlike in these references, we develop a similar method to prove the prediction formula itself, rather than a representation of prediction error, for continuous-time processes with stationary increments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%