2013
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial antagonism of propofol anaesthesia by physostigmine in rats is associated with potentiation of fast (80–200 Hz) oscillations in the thalamus

Abstract: We conclude that partial antagonism of propofol anaesthesia by physostigmine is associated with an increase in thalamic activity reflected in gamma/high-gamma (50-200 Hz) power. These findings are consistent with the view that anaesthetic-induced unconsciousness is associated with impairment of thalamic function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings suggest that the peripheral muscarinic side effects of physostigmine are not the reason for the lack of reanimation observed with physostigmine. The present results are consistent with the report by Reed et al 28 who found that the combination of physostigmine and glycopyrrolate (at the same doses used in this study) does not restore righting in rats during continuous propofol anesthesia. Because glycopyrrolate does not cross the blood-brain barrier, 14 the presence or absence of glycopyrrolate should not affect the electroencephalogram results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings suggest that the peripheral muscarinic side effects of physostigmine are not the reason for the lack of reanimation observed with physostigmine. The present results are consistent with the report by Reed et al 28 who found that the combination of physostigmine and glycopyrrolate (at the same doses used in this study) does not restore righting in rats during continuous propofol anesthesia. Because glycopyrrolate does not cross the blood-brain barrier, 14 the presence or absence of glycopyrrolate should not affect the electroencephalogram results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is because there is currently no standard arousal scoring system in the literature, although several groups have devised such systems in an effort to refine measures of the anesthetized state. 8,26-28 Furthermore, because physostigmine can produce significant effects at the neuromuscular junction, it is difficult to distinguish whether minor peripheral movements in the absence of righting represent physostigmine-induced muscle twitches, or a true change in arousal state. Although the highest dose of physostigmine (0.4 mg/kg) co-administered with glycopyrrolate (0.08 mg/kg) caused more muscle twitching than lower doses of physostigmine (0.1-0.2 mg/kg), these movements were distinct from the purposeful movements (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subcortical broadband gamma reduction confirms similar findings in rodent studies (Reed et al, 2013), and in one small series of thalamic recordings in humans (Verdonck et al, 2014). Broadband gamma power in cortex is thought to be an index of local neural activity and a surrogate for neural spiking (Miller et al, 2007, Manning et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The arousal scoring system was adapted from Reed et al (54). Leg, head, and whisker movements were scored as absent, mild, or moderate in intensity (0, 1, or 2, respectively) during 30 min of optical VTA stimulation while mice continuously inhaled 0.8 to 0.9% isoflurane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The person who conducted the scoring was blinded to the experimental intervention (e.g., ChR2+ vs. ChR2−; saline vs. SCH-23390) to prevent biasing. After optical stimulation was initiated, the animals were observed for signs of arousal and scored using an adaptation of the method of Reed et al (54). Spontaneous movements of the limbs, head, and whiskers were recorded on an itemized scoring sheet as absent, mild, or moderate in intensity (0, 1, or 2, respectively).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%