1996
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.125.3.307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial advance information and response preparation: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential.

Abstract: Response speed to a signal is faster when advance information about the forthcoming movement is provided before signal onset. Although this precuing effect is well established, the location of this saving in reaction time (RT) in the information-processing system is controversial. Some authors have claimed that the precuing effect resides at a motoric level, whereas others have suggested a nonmotoric locus. The present experiments used onset latencies of the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) to locate the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
200
2
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(73 reference statements)
18
200
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings have been reported in numerous studies (e.g. De Jong et al, 1988;Hackley and Miller, 1995;Leuthold et al, 1996;Mueller-Gethmann et al, 2000;Ulrich et al, 1998). This shows that the hand precues activated motor cortex.…”
Section: Precue Effects Under the Normal Mapping Conditionssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar findings have been reported in numerous studies (e.g. De Jong et al, 1988;Hackley and Miller, 1995;Leuthold et al, 1996;Mueller-Gethmann et al, 2000;Ulrich et al, 1998). This shows that the hand precues activated motor cortex.…”
Section: Precue Effects Under the Normal Mapping Conditionssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…stages (or "locus of an effect"), in turn, often bears on the theoretical interpretation of the effect. LRP fractionation has thus far been employed to discover the locus of a wide variety of RT effects, including those due to stimulus intensity (Miller et al, 1999), ancillary and redundant signals (Hackley and Valle-Inclan, 1999;Mordkoff et al, 1996), number of S-R alternatives (Miller and Ulrich, 1998), advance information provided by precues (Leuthold et al, 1996;Mueller-Gethmann et al, 2000;Osman et al, 1995), speed-accuracy tradeoffs (Osman et al, 2000;Van der Lubbe et al, 2001), and the psychological refractory period (Osman and Moore, 1993;Sommer et al, 2001).…”
Section: Lateralized Readiness Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…from scalp areas located above the left and right motor cortices Coles, 1989;de Jong et al, 1988;Gratton et al, 1988!. The LRP has become a significant tool in studies of mental chronometrỹ e.g., Eimer, Goshke, Schlangecken, & Sturmer, 1996;Hackley & Miller, 1995;Hackley & Valle-Inclán, 1998;Leuthold, Sommer, & Ulrich, 1996;Osman, Moore, & Ulrich, 1995!. For instance, we used the LRP to demonstrate that in a task in which stimuli occasionally contain conflicting information~i.e., noise information calling for a response opposite to that required by the target stimulus!…”
Section: The Lateralized Readiness Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of response preparation is usually studied using the precueing paradigm (e. g. [2][3][4][5]1). This paradigm relies on two types of stimuli: precue and imperative one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%