2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Part 2: Is the maxillary canting and its surgical correction in patients with CFM correlated to the mandibular deformity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was only the description of type II mandibular deformity developing a more prominent facial asymmetry than type I in the previous studies. 4,8 Comparably, Pluijmers et al 30 assessed the upper molar cant of 81 CFM patients and found a significant correlation with the severity of mandibular deformity (r = 0.370, P < .001). The extent of the lower dental midline deviation was found to have no correlation with the condylar hypoplasia extent or Pruzansky-Kaban types, which might be explained by the varied proportions of transverse translation to roll rotation of the mandibular midline (the long axis connecting the lower dental midline and chin midline) in relation to the midsagittal plane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There was only the description of type II mandibular deformity developing a more prominent facial asymmetry than type I in the previous studies. 4,8 Comparably, Pluijmers et al 30 assessed the upper molar cant of 81 CFM patients and found a significant correlation with the severity of mandibular deformity (r = 0.370, P < .001). The extent of the lower dental midline deviation was found to have no correlation with the condylar hypoplasia extent or Pruzansky-Kaban types, which might be explained by the varied proportions of transverse translation to roll rotation of the mandibular midline (the long axis connecting the lower dental midline and chin midline) in relation to the midsagittal plane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…OC is an unpleasant feature of a smile that influences the tooth show and the smile arc [ 17 , 18 ]. In severe forms, this transverse discrepancy requires surgical intervention [ 19 , 20 ]. Previous literature revealed a limitation in OC categorization among clinical orthodontics assessment indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found no significant difference in maxillary dilatation between the two groups, but the group with a untruncated maxillary junction showed more buccal inclination in the posterior tooth segment. The purpose of our research is to evaluate whether osteotomy of the lateral maxillary wall can be superior to the LFIO, considering its advantages in local anesthesia and other complications [ 22 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%