1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80326-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parotid and neck metastases from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
110
3
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
15
110
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The head and neck CSCC that have disseminated into the neck and/or parotid gland have a higher incidence of distant metastatic disease, are biologically more aggressive and histopathological findings show extracapsular spread in 70% of cases, which corresponds to our histopathological analysis (12/24 patients had extracapsular spread). 25 Better disease control could be achieved through encouraging more frequent use of ultrasound and/or MSCT diagnostics in the parotid region as a standard clinical practice. 26 Local extent of disease is the most important prognostic factor for primary head and neck CSCC, and the presence of regional metastases cuts the survival rate in half.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The head and neck CSCC that have disseminated into the neck and/or parotid gland have a higher incidence of distant metastatic disease, are biologically more aggressive and histopathological findings show extracapsular spread in 70% of cases, which corresponds to our histopathological analysis (12/24 patients had extracapsular spread). 25 Better disease control could be achieved through encouraging more frequent use of ultrasound and/or MSCT diagnostics in the parotid region as a standard clinical practice. 26 Local extent of disease is the most important prognostic factor for primary head and neck CSCC, and the presence of regional metastases cuts the survival rate in half.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khurana et al also reported that positive surgical margins were associated with poor local disease control (P ¼ .02). 28 Similarly, Ch'ng et al reported that margin status had a significantly unfavorable impact on survival (P < .01). 27,29 We acknowledge the many potential biases in comparing outcomes from different treatments delivered over many years and using nonrandomized methodology.…”
Section: >3mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Positive surgical margin was the only statistically significant factor associated with poor local control (P=0.05) in this study. Khurana et al [14] reported that positive surgical margins were associated with poor local control (P=0.02), as did O'Brien et al, who identified margin positivity as an independent predictor for parotid recurrence [15] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Several other studies have reported on prognostic factors for predicting local control and survival [1,14,16] . Joseph et al, observed that the involvement of multiple nodes, extracapsular spread, or vascular and perineural invasion were associated with increasing relapse rates [1] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%