1995
DOI: 10.1177/030908929502006702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paronomasia in the Book of Chronicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most significantly, Segert questions the proximity of homoeoteleuton : ‘It is not clear what should be considered the maximal distance between homoeoteleutons within which they will still function as acoustic poetic devices’ (1992: 176). Kalimi (1995) defines paronomasia as ‘a collocation of words which resemble one another in their roots or consonantal sounds, but differ in meaning’ (p. 27). According to him, the Chronicler alters certain parallels from Samuel and Kings for the sake of paronomasia.…”
Section: Sound and Significance (1992–2015)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most significantly, Segert questions the proximity of homoeoteleuton : ‘It is not clear what should be considered the maximal distance between homoeoteleutons within which they will still function as acoustic poetic devices’ (1992: 176). Kalimi (1995) defines paronomasia as ‘a collocation of words which resemble one another in their roots or consonantal sounds, but differ in meaning’ (p. 27). According to him, the Chronicler alters certain parallels from Samuel and Kings for the sake of paronomasia.…”
Section: Sound and Significance (1992–2015)mentioning
confidence: 99%