The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2016.7759551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pareto-optimal search over configuration space beliefs for anytime motion planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bi-objective criteria of solution cost and search effort is best reasoned about in the paradigm of anytime planning . In this paradigm, an algorithm traces out the Pareto frontier (Choudhury et al, 2016): finds a feasible solution quickly and iteratively improves it. In this paradigm, SaIL trains a heuristic that displays a behavior we would expect in the first iteration.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bi-objective criteria of solution cost and search effort is best reasoned about in the paradigm of anytime planning . In this paradigm, an algorithm traces out the Pareto frontier (Choudhury et al, 2016): finds a feasible solution quickly and iteratively improves it. In this paradigm, SaIL trains a heuristic that displays a behavior we would expect in the first iteration.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternate approach to modeling belief over configuration spaces is to assume edges are locally correlated. Under this assumption, one can use local models such as KDE [8], mixture of Gaussians [20], RKHS [28] or even customized models [27]. The efficacy of these models depends on how accurately they can represent the world, how efficiently they can be updated and how efficiently they can be projected on the graph.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are approaches that divide the configuration space into regions and either select different region-specific planning strategies [21] or use entropy of samples in a particular region to refine sampling [22]. Other methods try to model the free space to speed up planning [23][24][25]. While these techniques are quite successful in a large set of problems, they can place samples in regions where an optimal path is unlikely to traverse.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%