2020
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paresthesia-Free Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: An ACCURATE Study Sub-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the theta suppression and increase in low beta power that was observed during pain relief, DRGS produced an increase in theta activity and suppression of low beta power in the pain‐free state. While it is possible for DRGS to be programmed with subparesthetic stimulation paradigms, paraesthesias in the distribution of the targeted dermatome are still commonly observed during DRGS (40). These sensations are also likely produced independent of the neuromodulatory effect on pain relief (41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the theta suppression and increase in low beta power that was observed during pain relief, DRGS produced an increase in theta activity and suppression of low beta power in the pain‐free state. While it is possible for DRGS to be programmed with subparesthetic stimulation paradigms, paraesthesias in the distribution of the targeted dermatome are still commonly observed during DRGS (40). These sensations are also likely produced independent of the neuromodulatory effect on pain relief (41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DRG stimulation is an alternative to spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and has several proposed advantages. First, it can confine stimulation to a smaller, more specific area, thereby minimizing the risk of unwanted paresthesia outside the painful area (7). Second, it may provide stimulation in areas that can be difficult to cover with SCS such as very distal extremity areas or the torso (1,6,8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, DRG stimulation is less affected by postural changes and may thereby produce a more stable stimulation (9). Fourth, DRG stimulation can often be effective even with amplitudes below the paresthesia threshold and may thus produce less paresthesia, which is preferable in some individuals (7,9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DRG stimulation at standard frequencies also was associated with less postural variations in intensity of paresthesias, and in some cases a lack of paresthesias altogether. In fact, a subanalysis of the ACCURATE trial demonstrated patients who were paresthesia‐free had similar or improved outcomes of pain relief, quality of life, and mood states compared to those who were not paresthesia‐free (20). This further supports the hypothesis that paresthesias are not necessary for analgesia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of paresthesiafree stimulation in patients with dorsal column SCS (8,9,19) and DRG stimulation (20,21). To date, the efficacy of paresthesia-free stimulation in SNRS has not been evaluated in a real-world setting with long-term outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%