2017
DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parents’ Use of Subsidiaries to “Push Down” Earnings Management: Evidence from Italy

Abstract: We find evidence consistent with Italian nonlisted subsidiaries engaging in accrual and real earnings management, so that their listed parents can meet or beat benchmarks. Thus, the parent firm drives the earnings management of the subsidiaries. We identify parents that are more likely to have managed earnings as the ones that avoid a small loss or meet or beat analyst forecast by a few cents. Cross‐sectional analysis reveals that Big 4 auditors mitigate accrual earnings management at the subsidiary level and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(182 reference statements)
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, we control for the listing status of the parent company (ListedP), since the capital markets' pressure generates incentives for parent companies to manipulate their subsidiaries' accounts (Bonacchi et al, 2017), and in our sample the rate of listed parent companies is substantially higher among foreign investors, which is as expected because the rate of public companies in Spain is much lower than in many of the countries where the FDI comes from.…”
Section: δX Annual Change Of the Variable Xmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, we control for the listing status of the parent company (ListedP), since the capital markets' pressure generates incentives for parent companies to manipulate their subsidiaries' accounts (Bonacchi et al, 2017), and in our sample the rate of listed parent companies is substantially higher among foreign investors, which is as expected because the rate of public companies in Spain is much lower than in many of the countries where the FDI comes from.…”
Section: δX Annual Change Of the Variable Xmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Accordingly, several studies document lower reporting quality in the private setting: Ball and Shivakumar (2005) in the UK; Hope et al (2013) in the US; Burgstahler et al (2006) in a set of European countries; Goncharov and Zimmerman (2006) in Russia; or Arnedo, Lizarraga, and Sánchez-Alegría (2007) in Spain. There is also evidence that public companies use their private subsidiaries to manage the group's consolidated earnings in order to overcome the restrictions imposed by capital markets (Bonacchi, Cipollini, & Zarowin, 2017).…”
Section: Related Literature and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the expectation that most of our participants would be CFOs or controllers of privately held companies, we selected a financial target that would be relevant to both private and public companies (versus equity-based pressures). Indeed, both Bonacchi et al (2017) and Bianchi 19 Participants were post-experimentally asked to recall 1) the difference between the company's net income and cash flow from operations, and 2) the difference between the company's sales growth and growth in NFMs (measured via scales, where 1 = "Very small" and 7 = "Very large"). Non-tabulated results indicate that those in RED FLAGS present condition rated both of these differences to be significantly larger than those in the RED FLAGS not present condition (both p's < 0.01).…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike previous studies in the field (Huizinga & Laeven, 2008;Heckemeyer & Overesch, 2013;Bonacchi, Cipollini & Zarowin, 2018), this paper works only with individual financial data of subsidiaries. Mentioned studies utilise data from both consolidated statements of a parent company and individual financial statements of its subsidiaries to identify tax optimisation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%