2017
DOI: 10.1037/hea0000448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parents’ posttraumatic stress after burns in their school-aged child: A prospective study.

Abstract: The results indicate that a burn event to a child has a severe (acute) psychological impact on parents and that clinical levels of PTSS may persist in a subgroup of parents. The findings underline the need to incorporate parent support in burn care, especially for mothers with a strong emotional response during the first months after the burn event. (PsycINFO Database Record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
29
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To answer this question, we provide the pcc.step2step3 with 1 Figure 5). The new data by Egberts et al (2017) scored in the extreme 1.1% of the predicted data with respect to the replication hypothesis. Hence, we reject the replication of H 0 by Egberts et al (2017).…”
Section: The Prior Predictive P-valuementioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To answer this question, we provide the pcc.step2step3 with 1 Figure 5). The new data by Egberts et al (2017) scored in the extreme 1.1% of the predicted data with respect to the replication hypothesis. Hence, we reject the replication of H 0 by Egberts et al (2017).…”
Section: The Prior Predictive P-valuementioning
confidence: 85%
“…The linear slope of intrusion is regressed on anger and parent gender (i.e., β anger*s , β genderP*s ). Egberts, Schoot, Geenen, and Van Loey (2017)…”
Section: An Example Of a Multilevel Longitudinal Growth Curve Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given the complexity of the LGM model relative to the sample size, prior information was incorporated to facilitate the estimation of the model (i.e., step 1 of the WAMBS checklist). In addition to careful consideration of the plausible parameter space (see Chapter 3 by Van de Schoot, Veen, Smeets, Winter, and Depaoli), we used previous results to inform the priors in our current model (Egberts, Van de Schoot, Geenen, & Van Loey, 2017).…”
Section: Specifying and Understanding Priorsmentioning
confidence: 99%