2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental gamma irradiation induces reprotoxic effects accompanied by genomic instability in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
5
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would seem to be a consequence of an effect inherited from the parents. Results were similar to those observed in other exposure conditions (dose rate, recovery duration) by Hurem et al (2017a). Because no effect was observed in 10-d larvae, the oxidative stress induced by gamma irradiation seems to be transitory.…”
Section: Ros Production and Genotoxicity After Irradiated And Recoversupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This would seem to be a consequence of an effect inherited from the parents. Results were similar to those observed in other exposure conditions (dose rate, recovery duration) by Hurem et al (2017a). Because no effect was observed in 10-d larvae, the oxidative stress induced by gamma irradiation seems to be transitory.…”
Section: Ros Production and Genotoxicity After Irradiated And Recoversupporting
confidence: 88%
“…5793. AB wildtype zebrafish were maintained according to standard operating procedures with 28 °C and photoperiod of 10 h dark and 14 h light as described earlier [47].…”
Section: Zebrafish Husbandrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to be aware that different setups require different approaches. For thin specimens exposed in air (such as plants) it is necessary to consider buildup conditions (or the lack thereof); for larger organisms in air (like mice) we may want to calculate whole-body absorbed dose rates for different orientations and positions of the animals in their cages and estimate an average (Graupner et al 2017); and for setups with soil or water habitats, we need to account for the variation in absorbed dose rates with depth due to attenuation and scattering in the media (Hurem et al 2017). Geant4 simulations are useful in all these cases, but are limited by the ease and accuracy by which setups can be modelled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because such simulations cannot be directly validated without resorting e.g. to calorimetry, we instead validate simulations of the absorbed dose to water at a point, by modelling a 9 L aquarium for which we have measurements of the absorbed dose rate to water at a depth of 7.5 cm from previous work (Hurem et al 2017).…”
Section: The Geant4 Figaro Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation