Parent ICT use, social capital, and parenting efficacy

Jang, Juyoung; Hessel, Heather; Dworkin, Jodi

doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.025

Cited by 26 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Internet network is now a must in order to always exist in every social space; social space with internet access creates an atmosphere of social interaction (Jang, Hessel, & Dworkin, 2017). They can share knowledge (knowledge sharing), teach others (knowledge transfer), develop creative and innovative ideas, and develop participatory responses to the community environment.…”

Section: The Direction Of Social Capital On Productive Spacementioning

confidence: 99%

The Importance of Rural Social Productive Space to Increase the Social Capital of Agribusiness Community in Agropolitan Area

Syarifudin

Ishak

2020

JWL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Agropolitan area is a concept of functional space based on agricultural production, which requires a specific population density as a capital for the productivity of the rural regions with the support of urban utilities and social infrastructure/social space. Weak social capital makes the agropolitan area grow slowly. This is the impact of unplanned productive social space as a vehicle for social capital’s growth implemented in regional plans. However, social interactions occur if the social infrastructure is well articulated in creating spatial productivity, production, and multiphase inheritance for the sustainability of agribusiness activities. This study aims to identify the importance of social productive space in the form of social infrastructure to increase the social capital in agropolitan area. The method used is a case study to observe social processes that occur from time to time, supported by in-depth interview. The results indicate a typology of social capital that is not formed instantly, but contains a long history over time due to the repetition of interaction between communities in social spaces that are not technically constructed and unplanned in the agropolitan area spatial planning. This productive space is a place to build social closeness through repetition of interaction, sharing, knowledge transfer, equalization of perceptions involving residents, and collaboration between individuals and groups. The productive space in the form of social infrastructure consists of mosques, sports fields, markets, community meeting rooms (bale), business group rooms, and farmer groups. Therefore, the plan document must consider the functioning of social space and adaptive social space based on IT connections (cafes, sports clubs, open spaces, bale, and mosque grounds) into agropolitan spatial planning.

show abstract

Section: The Direction Of Social Capital On Productive Spacementioning

confidence: 99%

The Importance of Rural Social Productive Space to Increase the Social Capital of Agribusiness Community in Agropolitan Area

Syarifudin

Ishak

2020

JWL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Parents may use ICT for a variety of activities to satisfy their information and communication needs (Jang, Dworkin, & Parents' profiles of ICT proficiency 2271Hessel, 2015Rudi, Dworkin, Walker, & Doty, 2015). For example, parents may use ICT to maintain the social relationships with family members and friends by exchanging emails or might use online search tools to locate and manage information (Jang, Hessel, & Dworkin, 2017). Rudi et al (2015), for instance, reported that emails and text messages were popular methods used by parents to communicate with their children, particularly adolescent children.…”

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Parents' profiles concerning ICT proficiency and their relation to adolescents' information literacy: A latent profile analysis approach

Wu¹,

Yu²,

Yang³

et al. 2020

Brit J Educational Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

particular emphasis on the importance of parents in their children's information literacy (Zhu, Yang, et al., 2019). Parents could be considered their children's first teachers and tend to be deeply involved in their elementary and secondary education by helping with homework, communicating with schools, and advising or guiding academic decisions and career options (Hill & Tyson, 2009; Hornby & Witte, 2010; Seginer, 2006). Parental involvement refers to the resources that parents dedicate to the education of their children, including parent behaviors, aspirations, expectations, attitudes and beliefs regarding their children's education (Georgiou & Tourva, 2007; Grolnick & Slowiaczek, 1994).

show abstract

“…Higher social capital is thought to benefit the whole family. In intact families, parental social capital has been found to be positively associated with parenting efficacy (Jang, Hessel, & Dworkin, 2017), which in turn predicts socio‐emotional development (Shumow & Lomax, 2002), reduced mental health difficulties and positive educational outcomes in adolescents (Rothon, Goodwin, & Stansfeld, 2012). It is also positively associated with improved health and reduced risk of child abuse (Healy & Côté, 2001; Scrivens & Smith, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Socioeconomic deprivation and social capital in kinship carers using a helpline service

Taylor

Folco

Dupin

et al. 2020

Child & Family Social Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Kinship care is the preferred alternative for children who cannot remain with their birth family, maintaining birth family links and continuity in other parts of their life. However, kinship care has also been associated with risk factors including lack of support, difficult contact with biological parents, adverse childhood experiences for the child, carer stress and financial difficulties. Using routine data from a kinship care helpline service, this study employed a mixed-method analysis of the association between socioeconomic deprivation and risk factors reported by kinship carers and explored social capital in kinship families. Findings indicated common risk factors experienced by kinship families regardless of deprivation level. However, certain risk factors were reported more in areas of high or low socioeconomic deprivation. Mapping the social capital of kinship families indicated that kinship families connect more with relatives than other types of informal, semi-formal or formal support services. However, these relationships are often problematic. The most prominent obstacle to social capital growth in kinship carers was financial difficulties. Our findings suggest that kinship carers may use support services differentially according to deprivation level, and socioeconomic deprivation may influence building social capital in kinship families.

show abstract

Parent ICT use, social capital, and parenting efficacy

Cited by 26 publications

References 42 publications

The Importance of Rural Social Productive Space to Increase the Social Capital of Agribusiness Community in Agropolitan Area

The Importance of Rural Social Productive Space to Increase the Social Capital of Agribusiness Community in Agropolitan Area

Parents' profiles concerning ICT proficiency and their relation to adolescents' information literacy: A latent profile analysis approach

Socioeconomic deprivation and social capital in kinship carers using a helpline service

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About