2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00773-018-0571-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric study of solitary wave propagation and runup over fringing reefs based on a Boussinesq wave model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
16
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This ratio has been proved to be robust for the wave processes over the sloping plane beach (Shi et al 2012) and here we demonstrate that this ratio is also valid for the solitary wave propagation over the sharply varying reef bathymetry, where parameters of empirical breaking models have to be tuned (Yao et al 2012), with no need of tuning. The validation results presented in this paper are consistent with the previous work (Ning et al 2018), but the results for the case with the incident wave height of 0.07 m was not presented in Ning et al (2018). Moreover, Ning et al (2018) suggested dx = 0.01 m is accurate enough for the case with the incident wave height of 0.05 m while this study confirms dx = 0.02 m is also accurate enough and more computationally efficient even for the case with the incident wave height of 0.07 m, which has smaller incident wave length.…”
Section: Model Calibration and Validationsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This ratio has been proved to be robust for the wave processes over the sloping plane beach (Shi et al 2012) and here we demonstrate that this ratio is also valid for the solitary wave propagation over the sharply varying reef bathymetry, where parameters of empirical breaking models have to be tuned (Yao et al 2012), with no need of tuning. The validation results presented in this paper are consistent with the previous work (Ning et al 2018), but the results for the case with the incident wave height of 0.07 m was not presented in Ning et al (2018). Moreover, Ning et al (2018) suggested dx = 0.01 m is accurate enough for the case with the incident wave height of 0.05 m while this study confirms dx = 0.02 m is also accurate enough and more computationally efficient even for the case with the incident wave height of 0.07 m, which has smaller incident wave length.…”
Section: Model Calibration and Validationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The validation results presented in this paper are consistent with the previous work (Ning et al 2018), but the results for the case with the incident wave height of 0.07 m was not presented in Ning et al (2018). Moreover, Ning et al (2018) suggested dx = 0.01 m is accurate enough for the case with the incident wave height of 0.05 m while this study confirms dx = 0.02 m is also accurate enough and more computationally efficient even for the case with the incident wave height of 0.07 m, which has smaller incident wave length.…”
Section: Model Calibration and Validationsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, they are still insufficient to demonstrate the role of fringing reefs in the mitigation of tsunami hazards. More recently, Yao et al [23] and Ning et al [38] numerically investigated the effects of reef parameters on solitary wave run-up height, contributing to the understanding of the role of fringing reefs. Besides the run-up height, the maximum momentum flux in the solitary wave run-up zone also serves as a measure of tsunami damage potential with engineering and environmental significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shock-capturing Boussinesq model utilized in this study is FUNWAVE-TVD [34], which developed a high-order shock-capturing TVD (Total Variation Diminishing) scheme for the original FUNWAVE model [43]. With a proper value of the grid size and Manning coefficient incorporated in the bottom friction term, the present model has been shown to be robust for the solitary wave transformation and run-up over fringing reefs, as presented in Ning et al [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%