2006
DOI: 10.1080/00207170600726592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric optimization and optimal control using algebraic geometry methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial set is a rectangle such that 2.49 ≤ x 1 ≤ 2.51 and 1.49 ≤ x 2 ≤ 1.51. The results obtained using the two methods are shown in Figure 1 which are coherent with the phase portrait in [8]. We can see that the method using a change of variables achieved better precision since the reachable set it computed is include in the set computed by the other method.…”
Section: A Control Systemsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The initial set is a rectangle such that 2.49 ≤ x 1 ≤ 2.51 and 1.49 ≤ x 2 ≤ 1.51. The results obtained using the two methods are shown in Figure 1 which are coherent with the phase portrait in [8]. We can see that the method using a change of variables achieved better precision since the reachable set it computed is include in the set computed by the other method.…”
Section: A Control Systemsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Note that the above functions to optimize are polynomials. This problem is computationally difficult, despite recent progress in the development of methods and tools for polynomial programming (see for example [8] and references therein). An alternative solution is to find their affine bound functions, in order to replace the polynomial optimization problem by a linear programming one, which can be solved more efficiently (in polynomial time) using well-developed techniques, such as Simplex and interior point techniques [21].…”
Section: Template Polyhedramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations