2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter Optimization of Friction Stir Welding Of AA8011-6062 Using Mathematical Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A lot of single response optimization processes have been investigated on weld strengths of alloys such as AA6061-T6 and AA7075-T6 using either the Taguchi method (TM), central composite design (CCD) or response *For correspondence surface methodology (RSM) [7,[10][11][12][13]. However, the optimal condition of friction stir welding of AA8011-6062 composite was conducted by Elanchezhian et al [14] via TM. Two responses (tensile and impact strengths) were chosen for the analysis by the authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A lot of single response optimization processes have been investigated on weld strengths of alloys such as AA6061-T6 and AA7075-T6 using either the Taguchi method (TM), central composite design (CCD) or response *For correspondence surface methodology (RSM) [7,[10][11][12][13]. However, the optimal condition of friction stir welding of AA8011-6062 composite was conducted by Elanchezhian et al [14] via TM. Two responses (tensile and impact strengths) were chosen for the analysis by the authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two responses (tensile and impact strengths) were chosen for the analysis by the authors. Due to a single response optimization capability of TM, the parameter combination that produced the optimum tensile strength was different from that of optimum impact strength [14]. Thus, joints with a combination of high tensile strength and high impact strength could not be investigated at a single time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported that the welding speed was the dominant significant parameter compared to other parameters on the bead geometry of the joints. The lightweight nonferrous alloys were focused in aerospace, transportation and automobile industries due to its properties such as high strength-to-weight ratio and corrosion resistance using the friction stir welding process by Elanchezhian C et al [16]. They used the Taguchi L9 orthogonal array design to optimize the tensile strength of the welded joints with the optimum parameters of tool rotational speed of 1400 RPM, transverse speed of 75mm/min, plunge force of 7 kN, 15.54 mm diameter of the tool, 5.13 mm diameter of the tool pin with tool hardness of 600 HV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to these methods, a design for experiments is done and based on statistical analyses optimized values are obtained. Elanchezhian et al [12] applied a Taguchi L9 orthogonal array for the design of experiments and finally used ANOVA statistical tool to reveal the optimum values of parameters for FS welding of AA6061 and AA8011 aluminum alloys. Jafari et al [13] applied the Taguchi method for experiment design and RSM for determining the optimum values of process parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%