2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro 2007
DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2007.357046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter Estimation and Dynamic Source Localization for the Magnetoencephalography (Meg) Inverse Problem

Abstract: Dynamic estimation methods based on linear state-space models have been applied to the inverse problem of magnetoencephalography (MEG), and can improve source localization compared with static methods by incorporating temporal continuity as a constraint. The efficacy of these methods is influenced by how well the state-space model approximates the dynamics of the underlying brain current sources. While some components of the state-space model can be inferred from brain anatomy and knowledge of the MEG instrume… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later on, inverse solutions in the framework of Bayesian estimation were introduced, with the underlying assumption of temporal independence (Sato et al, 2004; Phillips et al, 2005; Mattout et al, 2006; Nummenmaa et al, 2007; Wipf and Nagarajan, 2009). In order to impose spatio-temporal smoothness on the inverse solution, subsequent algorithms in the Bayesian framework considered the design of spatio-temporal priors (Baillet and Garnero, 1997; Bolstad et al, 2009; Daunizeau et al, 2006; Daunizeau and Friston, 2007; Friston et al, 2008; Greensite, 2003; Limpiti et al, 2009; Trujillo-Barreto et al, 2008; Zumer et al, 2008) or employed linear state-space models (Galka et al, 2004; Yamashita et al, 2004; Long et al, 2011; Lamus et al, 2007). Despite their improved accuracy in source localization, many of these more recent solutions suffer from unwieldy computational complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later on, inverse solutions in the framework of Bayesian estimation were introduced, with the underlying assumption of temporal independence (Sato et al, 2004; Phillips et al, 2005; Mattout et al, 2006; Nummenmaa et al, 2007; Wipf and Nagarajan, 2009). In order to impose spatio-temporal smoothness on the inverse solution, subsequent algorithms in the Bayesian framework considered the design of spatio-temporal priors (Baillet and Garnero, 1997; Bolstad et al, 2009; Daunizeau et al, 2006; Daunizeau and Friston, 2007; Friston et al, 2008; Greensite, 2003; Limpiti et al, 2009; Trujillo-Barreto et al, 2008; Zumer et al, 2008) or employed linear state-space models (Galka et al, 2004; Yamashita et al, 2004; Long et al, 2011; Lamus et al, 2007). Despite their improved accuracy in source localization, many of these more recent solutions suffer from unwieldy computational complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, (1) we describe a model of the spatiotemporal dynamics based on nearest-neighbors multivariate autoregression along the cortical surface; (2) We develop an algorithm for dynamic estimation of cortical current sources and model parameters from MEG/EEG data based on the Kalman Filter, the Fixed Interval Smoother, and the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithms; (3) We derive expressions to relate our dynamic estimation formulas to those of standard static algorithms; (4) We apply our spatiotemporal dynamic method to simulated experiments of focal and distributed cortical activation as well as experimental data from a human subject. Portions of this work have been previously presented in Lamus et al (2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our analysis we computed the KF and FIS estimates by testing different values of the regularization parameter. This parameter can be estimated in an empirical Bayesian [Lamus et al (2007)] or a fully Bayesian framework. The spatial component of the model can be improved by using the structure of the particular experimental design to proposed specific forms of the F state-transition matrix.…”
Section: Somatosensory Meg Experimentmentioning
confidence: 99%