2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Subspace Pursuit-based Iterative Greedy Hierarchical solution to the neuromagnetic inverse problem

Abstract: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is an important non-invasive method for studying activity within the human brain. Source localization methods can be used to estimate spatiotemporal activity from MEG measurements with high temporal resolution, but the spatial resolution of these estimates is poor due to the ill-posed nature of the MEG inverse problem. Recent developments in source localization methodology have emphasized temporal as well as spatial constraints to improve source localization accuracy, but these met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most basic approaches based on L1 regularization priors [Uutela et al, ] typically yield temporally discontinuous source estimates, making them not suitable for FC analysis. More advanced methods have been developed to generate spatially sparse and temporally continuous reconstructions, e.g., temporal projections of L1‐norm estimates [Huang et al, ], empirical Bayesian inference [Friston et al, ; Wipf and Nagarajan, ; Wipf et al, ], mixed‐norm regularization [Gramfort et al, ; Ou et al, ] or subspace pursuit algorithms [Babadi et al, ]. By design, these approaches should limit spatial leakage effects and may thus be promising, although they have not yet been evaluated for MEG/EEG FC analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most basic approaches based on L1 regularization priors [Uutela et al, ] typically yield temporally discontinuous source estimates, making them not suitable for FC analysis. More advanced methods have been developed to generate spatially sparse and temporally continuous reconstructions, e.g., temporal projections of L1‐norm estimates [Huang et al, ], empirical Bayesian inference [Friston et al, ; Wipf and Nagarajan, ; Wipf et al, ], mixed‐norm regularization [Gramfort et al, ; Ou et al, ] or subspace pursuit algorithms [Babadi et al, ]. By design, these approaches should limit spatial leakage effects and may thus be promising, although they have not yet been evaluated for MEG/EEG FC analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Babadi et al [1] recently proposed a clustering technique which uses the most significant eigenmodes of pre-computed Voronoi regions. In comparison to that, we used an anatomical brain atlas instead of Voronoi regions which allows to keep an anatomical, often related to a functional, representation of the cortex and provides an easily interpretable result for our real-time monitor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter two methods have been found to need significant modification for application to snapshot MEG [3].…”
Section: Regularization and Spatial Sparsitymentioning
confidence: 99%