1981
DOI: 10.1364/ao.20.003020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter correlation and precision in multiple-angle ellipsometry

Abstract: A general procedure for the characterization of the optical parameters of a given surface using fixed wavelength multiple-angle-of-incidence ellipsometry is developed. Quantitative evaluation of estimated parameter precision is studied considering the sum of errors squared of a least squares fit, the parameter cross-correlation at this minimum, and the confidence limits of the parameters from variance-covariance relations. Most significantly, it is shown numerically that precision is improved when the solution… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then it might become impossible to distinguish experimentally which of the parameters, the refractive index or the thickness, causes the changes observed for certain ellipsometric characteristics. The latter circumstances can restrict significantly the resources of direct optimization methods [13] for solving a standard inverse ellipsometric problem, due to increasing confidence limits occurring for the correlated parameters [10,14,15], and even result in failure to obtain a unique solution. Hence, the ellipsometric studies of essentially thin films face serious problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then it might become impossible to distinguish experimentally which of the parameters, the refractive index or the thickness, causes the changes observed for certain ellipsometric characteristics. The latter circumstances can restrict significantly the resources of direct optimization methods [13] for solving a standard inverse ellipsometric problem, due to increasing confidence limits occurring for the correlated parameters [10,14,15], and even result in failure to obtain a unique solution. Hence, the ellipsometric studies of essentially thin films face serious problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spectroscopic (as opposed to single wavelength) ellipsometry measurements at a fixed angle of incidence helps to decrease the correlation, but does not overcome this problem (34,35), especially when the number of unknown parameters is more than two. In order to obtain more information about the properties of the interface, it is useful to use both SE and MAI measurements to eliminate the correlation between the thickness of the interface and its optical parameters.…”
Section: Correlation Of Parameters and Measurement Errors Film Thickmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…+ fc2e/x]2 = -^^l^= « where is an arbitrary constant and real because of translation invariance within the plane. One may write so that ^ixkaOL X = e"*"** (12) where in the ambient region, = \/i7sin0 = constant > 0, (13) with £0 being the dielectric function of the ambient region, and 0 being the angle of incidence of the light, i.e., 0<<^< y. Here, (^= 0) involves a direction normal to the surface.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the differential representation of Majcwell's equations across a surface of discontinuity in piecewise continuous media, the tangential fields, Ey and H^^are continuous across boundaries between adjacent layers. Consequently, eq (12) becomes valid within each spatial region, i.e., ambient, layers, and substrate. Then, letting ri = \J z^Lo?…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%