1975
DOI: 10.1145/355656.355657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel Tridiagonal Equation Solvers

Abstract: Parallel Tridiagonal Equation Solversby Harold S. Stone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most probably we can rule out the recursive doubling method since it has a scalar count with order higher than the other two methods. Stone [8] devised a modified recursive doubling procedure with a lower scalar count that is consistent. But the count is still about twice as big as either of the two competing methods.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Parallel Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most probably we can rule out the recursive doubling method since it has a scalar count with order higher than the other two methods. Stone [8] devised a modified recursive doubling procedure with a lower scalar count that is consistent. But the count is still about twice as big as either of the two competing methods.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Parallel Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the recent development and availability of various parallel and vector computers, new algorithms have appeared for solving tridiagonal systems of equations suitable for these machines. Notable among these methods are the recursive doubling method {Stone [8]) and the cyclic reduction method (Lambiotte and Voigt [5]). The recursive doubling method is designed for a parallel computer such as the Illiac IV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= P ! ), because the algorithm, whether it is Partitioned Thomas method [7] or odd--even cyclic reduction [6], is easily applicable to a 1--D processor grid, and the usual block size n ! is much smaller than the number of blocks n !…”
Section: Selection Of the Parallel Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "fill--in" blocks are managed to find a solution through the communications between the subsystems [7]. Conversely, the cyclic odd--even reduction algorithm [6] has no matrix fill--in step that requires significant additional time in the partitioned Thomas method. The logarithmic cyclic reductions of the algorithm are the most efficient when both P !…”
Section: Selection Of the Parallel Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation