1981
DOI: 10.1145/355945.355947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Parallel Method for Tridiagonal Equations

Abstract: A new (partition) method for solving a tndiagonal system of lmear equations is presented in this paper The method is suitable for both parallel and vector computers. Although the partition method has a shghtly higher vector operatmn count than those of the two competing methods (the recursive doubling method and the cychc reduction method), it has a scalar count much smaller than that of the recursive doubling. The scalar counts between the partition method and the cyclic reduction method are so close as to ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
92
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
92
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The time t,, is smaller than the computing time 20An + lOAm + 6Cm of Kowalik's algorithm (1984). Also the algorithm of Wang (1981) requires more operations than ours. Bondeli (1991) does not give the computing time for parallel systems.…”
Section: The Algorithm For Other Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The time t,, is smaller than the computing time 20An + lOAm + 6Cm of Kowalik's algorithm (1984). Also the algorithm of Wang (1981) requires more operations than ours. Bondeli (1991) does not give the computing time for parallel systems.…”
Section: The Algorithm For Other Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The method to be described in this paper is similar to the partition method derived by Wang (1981) for diagonally dominant tridiagonal systems with variable coefficients. He divides the matrix of the linear system into blocks and first eliminates the unknowns from the block's interior by a suitable Gaussian elimination procedure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= P ! ), because the algorithm, whether it is Partitioned Thomas method [7] or odd--even cyclic reduction [6], is easily applicable to a 1--D processor grid, and the usual block size n ! is much smaller than the number of blocks n !…”
Section: Selection Of the Parallel Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…subsystem, which proceeds with eliminations by the Thomas method simultaneously and results in "fill--in" blocks. The "fill--in" blocks are managed to find a solution through the communications between the subsystems [7]. Conversely, the cyclic odd--even reduction algorithm [6] has no matrix fill--in step that requires significant additional time in the partitioned Thomas method.…”
Section: Selection Of the Parallel Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation