2012
DOI: 10.3791/3349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel-plate Flow Chamber and Continuous Flow Circuit to Evaluate Endothelial Progenitor Cells under Laminar Flow Shear Stress

Abstract: The overall goal of this method is to describe a technique to subject adherent cells to laminar flow conditions and evaluate their response to well quantifiable fluid shear stresses 1 .Our flow chamber design and flow circuit ( Fig. 1) contains a transparent viewing region that enables testing of cell adhesion and imaging of cell morphology immediately before flow (Fig. 11A, B), at various time points during flow (Fig. 11C), and after flow (Fig. 11D). These experiments are illustrated with human umbilical cord… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While various applications of surface micro-patterning are limited by the real-time analysis of the printing process 33–35 , the microfluidic printing technology described herein utilizes a microscope objective aligned with the print surface, allowing real-time analysis of the process. A parallel plate flow chamber is an often used and validated model for determining cell adhesion 32 ; however, cellular interactions constrained by two material surfaces may not be an appropriate model for many FBR cell adhesion measurements in which cells directly experience unrestrained differential flow based on their relative location to the device surface. The ability to interrogate cellular interactions under continuous flow over time represents a distinct advantage of the described vertical microfluidic printing device, which is able to create a reversible seal on a wet or dry surface 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While various applications of surface micro-patterning are limited by the real-time analysis of the printing process 33–35 , the microfluidic printing technology described herein utilizes a microscope objective aligned with the print surface, allowing real-time analysis of the process. A parallel plate flow chamber is an often used and validated model for determining cell adhesion 32 ; however, cellular interactions constrained by two material surfaces may not be an appropriate model for many FBR cell adhesion measurements in which cells directly experience unrestrained differential flow based on their relative location to the device surface. The ability to interrogate cellular interactions under continuous flow over time represents a distinct advantage of the described vertical microfluidic printing device, which is able to create a reversible seal on a wet or dry surface 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following, one of the two glass slides was designated as a static control and transferred to a quadriPERM cell culture vessel (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany, in 10 ml of EC medium), and incubated. The other glass slide was inserted into a parallel plate flow chamber [19] in a flow circuit consisting of a 125 ml reservoir (Cole Parmer, Pyrex, IL, USA), peristaltic pump (L/S variable-speed economy drive and Easy Load Pump Head; Masterflex, IL, USA), and pulse dampener (Masterflex) in EC medium (total circuit volume 100 ml). pBD-ECs in our parallel plate flow chamber were exposed to a shear stress of 25 dynes/cm 2 calculated according to normalτ=6normalÎŒnormalQ/normalwh2 where τ denotes the wall shear stress (dynes/cm 2 ), ÎŒ the medium viscosity at 37°C (0.01 g/cm/s), w the channel width (2.5 cm), h the channel height (0.04 cm), Q the volumetric flow rate (cm 3 /s) [19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different from microfluidic chambers, large numbers of cells in other two flow chambers can be harvested after flow experiments for subsequent experiments such as RT-PCR [20], western blot [20] and immunohistochemistry [21]. Using the aforementioned chambers, different wall shear stress waveforms were generated [17, 22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%