2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.05.17.492023
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel evolution of mutational fitness effects over 50,000 generations

Abstract: Over evolutionary time, bacteria face changing environments, which may require different sets of genes for survival. As they adapt to a specific constant environment, some genes are modified and lost, which can increase fitness while also modulating the effects of further gene losses. However, whether evolutionary specialization leads to systematic changes in robustness to gene loss is largely unexplored. Here, we compare the effects of insertion mutations in Escherichia coli between ancestral and 12 independe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A potentially important difference is that the fitness variation among the yeast backgrounds was generated by crossing two distantly related strains, whereas we use a series of backgrounds from lineages undergoing adaptation to the same environment in which we assess the fitness effects of the new mutations. As further support for our findings, a companion study focused on the evolution of gene essentiality in the LTEE found no systematic changes in deleterious effects across all of the lineages at 50,000 generations ( 29 ). In any case, theoretical predictions about the tail of deleterious mutations differ substantially and have been guided mostly by plausibility arguments ( 14, 15 ), and so all of these studies should help refine current models by clarifying the assumptions and narrowing the range of parameters.…”
Section: Constancy Of the Deleterious Tail Of The Dfesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…A potentially important difference is that the fitness variation among the yeast backgrounds was generated by crossing two distantly related strains, whereas we use a series of backgrounds from lineages undergoing adaptation to the same environment in which we assess the fitness effects of the new mutations. As further support for our findings, a companion study focused on the evolution of gene essentiality in the LTEE found no systematic changes in deleterious effects across all of the lineages at 50,000 generations ( 29 ). In any case, theoretical predictions about the tail of deleterious mutations differ substantially and have been guided mostly by plausibility arguments ( 14, 15 ), and so all of these studies should help refine current models by clarifying the assumptions and narrowing the range of parameters.…”
Section: Constancy Of the Deleterious Tail Of The Dfesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Like the error bounds estimated before, we observe that errors are consistently larger for more deleterious mutations (Fig 1B). We turned to a deeply sequenced transposon sequencing dataset of E. coli B REL606 from our previous work (Limdi et al, 2022). We found a statistically significant negative correlation between the estimated fitness of disrupting a gene and the error in the estimate ( p -value < 0.001, Fig 1C); this pattern was more evident when we binned by mutant effect sizes (Fig 1D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRISPRi screens in diverse E. coli strains have shown that gene essentiality varies widely between strains, and that phylogenetic distance is a poor predictor of the fitness effect of any particular gene (20); similar observation have been made using transposon mutagenesis in a collection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains (18). Even during a relatively short period of adaptation to a static environment, recent work investigating gene essentiality in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment (LTEE) found nearly two hundred genes that change in essentiality status (81). Here, we had initially expected to identify genus-specific essential genes but were unable to support this with our TraDIS dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%