2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0098-8472(02)00062-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paraheliotropism in two Phaseolus species: combined effects of photon flux density and pulvinus temperature, and consequences for leaf gas exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Its ecophysiological significance consists in the light interception maximization and the carbon gain enhancement, provided that the leaf has the physiological capacity to utilize high irradiances (Forseth & Ehleringer, 1983). Paraheliotropism is the ability of leaves to maintain the leaf lamina parallel to the sun's direct rays, and this phenomenon is often associated with plant efforts to reduce the negative effects of water stress (Kao & Forseth, 1992), UVB photoinhibition (Bawhey et al, 2003), and high leaf temperature (Bielenberg et al, 2003), generally acting on transpiration and stomatal conductance (Isoda & Shah, 2006). Photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) (Fu & Ehleringer, 1991), leaf temperature (Bielenberg et al, 2003), soil water potential, leaf water potential (Rosa et al, 1991), and nitrogen availability (Kao & Forseth, 1992) also can affect leaf positioning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its ecophysiological significance consists in the light interception maximization and the carbon gain enhancement, provided that the leaf has the physiological capacity to utilize high irradiances (Forseth & Ehleringer, 1983). Paraheliotropism is the ability of leaves to maintain the leaf lamina parallel to the sun's direct rays, and this phenomenon is often associated with plant efforts to reduce the negative effects of water stress (Kao & Forseth, 1992), UVB photoinhibition (Bawhey et al, 2003), and high leaf temperature (Bielenberg et al, 2003), generally acting on transpiration and stomatal conductance (Isoda & Shah, 2006). Photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) (Fu & Ehleringer, 1991), leaf temperature (Bielenberg et al, 2003), soil water potential, leaf water potential (Rosa et al, 1991), and nitrogen availability (Kao & Forseth, 1992) also can affect leaf positioning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heliotropism can be divided into two classes: (i) diaheliotropism, in which the leaf lamina become oriented at an angle perpendicular to incoming light; and (ii) paraheliotropism, where leaf lamina orient parallel to the light (Koller, 1986(Koller, , 1990Liu et al, 2007). Light interception is maximized by diaheliotropism and minimized by paraheliotropism (Koller 1986(Koller , 1990Bielenberg et al, 2003;Pastenes et al, 2005). However, under natural conditions, some solar-tracking plants can also move their leaves to avoid full exposure to sunlight, minimizing heating and water stress (Caldas et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On clear days paraheliotropism can reduce total radiant energy on the leaf blade by 20-30% . Therefore, these leaf movements have an influence on leaf energy balance, leaf temperature, transpirational water loss, carbon gain through photosynthesis, water use efficiency (WUE), photoinhibition, and the return in carbon of the nitrogen invested in photosynthesis (Koller et al, 1985;Ludlow and Bjorkman, 1987;Ehleringer, 1989 and1991;Berg and Heuchelin, 1990;Forseth, 1990;Bielenberg et al, 2003). The regulation of all these factors may give these plants an advantage in growth and seed production when compared to plants with stationary leaves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%