2015
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(15)61981-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paradoxical Low Flow-Low Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Clinical Entity or a Scientific Artifact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The conditions listed are some of the most common causes for which some authors believe that this form of aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction and low flow called a paradoxical lowflow low-gradient aortic stenosis may in fact be a technical artifact. [26] The explanation of the increased frequency of this form in our study, compared to the data published in the literature, could be represented by the evaluation of all hospitalized patients with aortic stenosis and those referred by other medical services, known or not with this condition. Studies in the literature do not always specify the methodology of recruiting the patients included in the study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conditions listed are some of the most common causes for which some authors believe that this form of aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction and low flow called a paradoxical lowflow low-gradient aortic stenosis may in fact be a technical artifact. [26] The explanation of the increased frequency of this form in our study, compared to the data published in the literature, could be represented by the evaluation of all hospitalized patients with aortic stenosis and those referred by other medical services, known or not with this condition. Studies in the literature do not always specify the methodology of recruiting the patients included in the study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 46%
“…The literature [3,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] describes the existence in the group of severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction, of a subgroup of patients with aortic orifice area less than 1cm 2 , but who present maximal transvalvular systolic velocities lower than 4 m/s at the echocardiographic evaluation. According to these studies, the explanation of the phenomenon would mainly consist of the existence of important concentric left ventricular hypertrophy that associates a small ventricular cavity and a low systolic flow.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cuando se revisa la situación media de flujo transvalvular en la literatura referente a la estenosis aórtica severa de bajo flujo y bajo gradiente desde esta perspectiva 4 , destaca la frecuente mala clasificación de la situación de flujo transvalvular que supone el empleo del criterio actualmente aceptado, no siendo infrecuente que la situación de flujo transvalvular definida según gasto, índice cardiaco o tasa de flujo transvalvular sea normal en pacientes clasificados como bajo flujo según el criterio de iVS. Y lo contrario, la presencia de tasas de flujo transvalvular medias bajas en los grupos de referencia empleados en los que se esperaría que esta fuese normal.…”
Section: El íNdice De Volumen Latido Como Criterio De Bajo Flujounclassified
“…Es especialmente relevante tener en cuenta la situación hemodinámica básica de presión arterial, frecuencia cardíaca y ritmo en el momento de obtener los índices de severidad hemodinámica, pues estos pueden modificar los valores obtenidos y deben ser normalizados antes de la evaluación de la severidad. No deja de sorprender que con frecuencia no sea posible conocer la situación hemodinámica básica de los diferentes grupos en los estudios referentes a la entidad que nos ocupa, a pesar de restringirse el análisis a las revistas monográficas de cardiología de mayor impacto 4 .…”
Section: Otras Consideracionesunclassified