Paradox and Legitimacy in Transnational Legal Pluralism

Abstract

General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.-Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research-You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain-You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright, please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Judging without Railings: An Ethic of Responsible Judicial Decision-Making for Future Generations

“…Their claims must first be understood as claims. Yet, as these claims often rely on 'novel connections between actions and interests' that are not currently recognised as causal, proximate or serious enough, 101 they are at risk of being dismissed as nonsense. 102 Thus, to prepare her fresh judgment, the judge must develop a particular sensitivity to those others who are excluded from the current conception of who is affected.…”

Quod Omnes Tangit: Transnational Constitutions Without Democracy?

“…The legitimacy of the regimes is heightened when these rules are oriented toward a cognitive openness to environmental concerns in the broadest sense, toward the interests of third parties and toward public interests. 72 Here is the proper site for regime constitutions to establish principles of critical professionalism, 73 of regime-internal opposition, and of regimeinternal pluralism. And the principles that the school of global administrative law has developed ± due process in regulation, notice-and-comment rules, obligations to consult experts, the principle of proportionality, respect for fundamental rights ± are primary candidates for constitutional norms in transnational regimes.…”

Quod omnes tangit: Transnationale Verfassungen ohne Demokratie?

“…Die Regeln sind an kognitiver Offenheit gegenüber Umweltbelangen, an Interessen von Drittbetroffenen und am öffentlichen Interesse zu orientieren. 69 Dies ist der Ort, an dem Regime-Verfassungen Prinzipien eines kritischen Professionalismus, einer regime-internen Opposition und eines regime-internen Pluralismus positivieren müssten. 70 Und die bekannten Regeln des Global Administrative Law -due process der Regulierung, notice-and-comment-Regeln, Pflicht zur Konsultation von Experten, Prinzip der Verhältnismäßigkeit und Grundrechtsschutz -sind primäre Kandidaten für die Konstitutionalisierung der Regimes.…”