2008
DOI: 10.2319/042307-206.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PAR Evaluation of Treated Class I Extraction Patients

Abstract: The cases evaluated showed a high-standard orthodontic finishing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0
12

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(29 reference statements)
4
17
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of malocclusion in India varies from 20 to 43% but little attention has been paid to orphan children in India. 8 Hence, the present study was undertaken to assess the prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment needs at the age of 12 to 15 years orphan children in India.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of malocclusion in India varies from 20 to 43% but little attention has been paid to orphan children in India. 8 Hence, the present study was undertaken to assess the prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment needs at the age of 12 to 15 years orphan children in India.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of malocclusion has been reported to vary from 11 to 93%. [9][10][11][12] This divergence in prevalence figures may depend on differences for specific ethnic groups, age, number of subjects examined and more importantly the differences in registration methods. There are several methods that are employed over the years to evaluate malocclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of malocclusion differs from place to place and among different ages, gender and location. Its incidence has been reported to vary from 11% to 93% [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%