2012
DOI: 10.3183/npprj-2012-27-04-p806-813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PAPER PHYSICS. Analytical Prediction of Package Collapse Loads-Basic considerations

Abstract: Calculation of Box Compression Resistance (BCR) is a challenging task and here the possibility of an engineering approach is considered. The strive has been towards obtaining a simple and generat predictive tool with as few parameters as possible and still obtaining an accurate estimate of the BCR. The model proposed is based on the concept of dividing the package into panels and corner panels. With these remarkably few structural elements it is possible to obtain simple explicit formulas where the only materi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The failure strength in this test, the SCT value, is considered to be an important measure for, for example, the foldability of the material, see Cavlin 1 and Carlsson et al, 2 and the box compression strength, cf. Ristinmaa et al 3 However, the deformation mechanisms that are active during this test have not yet been fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure strength in this test, the SCT value, is considered to be an important measure for, for example, the foldability of the material, see Cavlin 1 and Carlsson et al, 2 and the box compression strength, cf. Ristinmaa et al 3 However, the deformation mechanisms that are active during this test have not yet been fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the radius increases 3.6 times, the strength only increases about 25%, from 20-25 N to 25-30 N, depending on load case. It should also be noted that these values are far from the expected box compression resistance of the package, which can be estimated at 161 N and 276 N for orientations A and B, respectively, using the method described by Ristinmaa et al 3 and Korin et al 4 Because the corner For the spheres with larger radii, a change of stiffness was observed at some value for the displacement (see Figure 7 for an example). If the hypothesis holds that the transition should occur when the sphere makes contact with the crease and the standing panel is compressed directly, then there should be a linear relationship between the theoretical displacement at transition as calculated by using Equation 1 and the measured displacement at transition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Panyarjun and Burgess and Eriksson, Korin and Thuvander. 8,9 Ristinmaa et al 3 noted that predicting damage formation was the key to predicting compression resistance. Therefore, studying damage formation seems like a reasonable first step when trying to understand other loads as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study by Everitt et al ., Everitt et al the methods by McKee et al ., McKee et al Grangård Grangård and Ristinmaa et al . Ristinmaa et al were utilized to predict the box compression strength of cigarette and milk packaging. Each of the methods utilized in the study by Everitt et al Everitt et al provided good accuracy for some types of boards and poor accuracies for others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple‐to‐use, predictive method is desirable for both box producers (to develop structurally sufficient and efficient packaging as well as to develop a wide range of box designs) and paper producers (to sell their product to box producers). Three predictive methods, McKee et al ., McKee et al Grangård Grangård and Ristinmaa et al ., Ristinmaa et al were studied for paperboard (i.e. cardboard) box compression strength by Everitt et al Everitt et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%