2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.08.215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paper # 215: Muscle Architectural and Functional Differences Between Traditional vs. Early Active Rehabilitation Programs After Achilles Tendon Repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 This altered production of collagen may result in the tendon being less resistant to tensile forces and, thus, at increased risk of rupture. 10 As for the FHL harvest, transfer morbidity is clinically insignificant, even for good push-off or balance in running sports. 11 Our minimally invasive technique for achieving FHL transfer further eliminates morbidity from this procedure, such as wound healingerelated problems (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 This altered production of collagen may result in the tendon being less resistant to tensile forces and, thus, at increased risk of rupture. 10 As for the FHL harvest, transfer morbidity is clinically insignificant, even for good push-off or balance in running sports. 11 Our minimally invasive technique for achieving FHL transfer further eliminates morbidity from this procedure, such as wound healingerelated problems (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%