1999
DOI: 10.1080/016396299266551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

panhandling repertoires and routines for overcoming the nonperson treatment

Abstract: In this article, I present panhandling as a dynamic undertaking that requires conscious actions and purposeful modifications of self, performances, and emotions to gain the attention and interest of passersby. I show that describing and theorizing panhandling in terms of dramaturgical routines is useful in understanding the interactions and exchanges that constitute panhandling. In addition, repertoires rightly portray panhandlers as agents engaging the social world rather than as passive social types. From th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(2 reference statements)
1
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This inherently leads to a callous-like state in which the passersby, among other behaviours, ignore nonessential information (Inattentional Blindness) and fend-off others (Milgram, 1970 andCoon &Mitterer, 2008). A robot attempting to instantiate an interaction with a naive passerby is likely to be faced with these challenges, the passersby are likely to ignore the robot or, upon attending to it, perceive its request for an interaction as attempted panhandling and fend-off its attempt (Goldberg, 1995 andLankenau, 1999). However, as previously described, sociocontextual cues can individualise (in this case potentially defeating Inattentional Blindness) and communicate intention (in this case offering, which could defeat the percept of the robot's role as being that of a panhandler).…”
Section: Study 2: Instantiating An Interaction With a Particular Passmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This inherently leads to a callous-like state in which the passersby, among other behaviours, ignore nonessential information (Inattentional Blindness) and fend-off others (Milgram, 1970 andCoon &Mitterer, 2008). A robot attempting to instantiate an interaction with a naive passerby is likely to be faced with these challenges, the passersby are likely to ignore the robot or, upon attending to it, perceive its request for an interaction as attempted panhandling and fend-off its attempt (Goldberg, 1995 andLankenau, 1999). However, as previously described, sociocontextual cues can individualise (in this case potentially defeating Inattentional Blindness) and communicate intention (in this case offering, which could defeat the percept of the robot's role as being that of a panhandler).…”
Section: Study 2: Instantiating An Interaction With a Particular Passmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exceptions include Chaudhuri's (1987) research on women who beg near temples in India, Schak's (1988) research on a community of beggars in Taiwan, and Martínez Novo's (2003) research on indigenous women street vendors and beggars in Mexico. Within North America and Britain, much of the contemporary research on begging explores the issue through the lens of homelessness (Duncan, 1978;Fitzpatrick & Kennedy, 2001;Lankenau, 1999aLankenau, , 1999bSnow & Anderson, 1993;Wardhaugh, 1996). Other literature analyses: public attitudes and the moral discourse surrounding begging (Adler, 1999;Dean & Gale, 1999;Erskine & McIntosh, 1999;Jordan, 1999); begging in the Victorian city (Jaffe, 1990;Murdoch, 2003;Rose, 1988); begging governance (Hermer, 2007;Hopkins Burke, 1999); and begging youth (Coles & Craig, 1999;Helleiner, 2003).…”
Section: The Offensive Beggarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C'est une condition spectaculaire : l'itinérant occupe les espaces publics et interagit avec les passants. La mendicité s'inscrit d'ailleurs spécifiquement dans l'interface entre le passant et l'itinérant et force une réponse du citoyen ordinaire face à l'itinérance (Lankeneau, 1999 ;Pichon, 1992Pichon, , 1993Pichon, , 1994. Comme le souligne Damon (1998), les mendiants font tache dans une société policée et urbanisée car ils sont le signe de troubles que l'on aimerait oublier et l'empreinte de défauts évidents dans le système de protection sociale.…”
unclassified