2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/968573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleocurrents, Paleohydraulics, and Palaegeography of Miocene-Pliocene Siwalik Foreland Basin of India

Abstract: Early Miocene-Pliocene Middle Siwalik Subgroup of Kuluchaur area, Uttarakhand, North India, comprises sheet-like, coarse to medium grained, cross bedded sandstone bodies and multistoreyed variegated mudstones. Paleocurrent study shows commonly unimodal and locally bimodal distribution and displays a high magnitude of resultant (R*=0.7337) oriented towards south-southwest (206°  ±  42.27°). Palaeochannel morphological attributes suggest that the depositing river system was about 230 m wide and 4.5 m deep. These… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Irrespective of the slope, the sinuosity of the Siwalik channels is similar to the modern fan rivers and fall mostly in the zone of braided rivers (sinuosity <1.26; Schumm, 1985). This observation is in good agreement with the slope (calculated from the available set thickness, Table S2) and sinuosity data from the other Siwalik regions of the Himalayan foreland basin (HFB) (Shukla et al, 2009;Mandal et al, 2014;Goswami & Deopa, 2014;Khan & Tewari, 2015). The comparison of slope and sinuosity data with the modern fan rivers and sedimentological analysis together suggest that the Siwalik Group at the Kangra sub-basin (KSB) were possibly deposited either in a small fan or at the proximal part of a medium or large fan (Fig.…”
Section: Hydrological Status Of the Siwalik Channelssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Irrespective of the slope, the sinuosity of the Siwalik channels is similar to the modern fan rivers and fall mostly in the zone of braided rivers (sinuosity <1.26; Schumm, 1985). This observation is in good agreement with the slope (calculated from the available set thickness, Table S2) and sinuosity data from the other Siwalik regions of the Himalayan foreland basin (HFB) (Shukla et al, 2009;Mandal et al, 2014;Goswami & Deopa, 2014;Khan & Tewari, 2015). The comparison of slope and sinuosity data with the modern fan rivers and sedimentological analysis together suggest that the Siwalik Group at the Kangra sub-basin (KSB) were possibly deposited either in a small fan or at the proximal part of a medium or large fan (Fig.…”
Section: Hydrological Status Of the Siwalik Channelssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The filled and empty stars represent the slope S 1 (Schumm, 1972) and S 2 (Trampush et al, 2014), respectively. The average slope and sinuosity of the other Siwalik regions (estimated following Schumm, 1972;black dots;Khan & Tewari, 2015;Shukla et al, 2009;Goswami & Deopa, 2015;Mandal et al, 2014) are also comparable with the KSB data. The error bar indicates the uncertainty associated with the estimation of slope (S 1 ) of the Siwalik channels.…”
Section: Hydrological Status Of the Siwalik Channelssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Additional approximation of the paleoslope can be derived using the Manning equation for the open channel flow systems. This same relationship has been used to determine the paleochannel slope in many ancient fluvial rivers [5,8].…”
Section: Paleo-channel Slope (Sc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent researches provide a methodology to evaluate paleo dimensions and flow dynamics of ancient fluvial systems [5][6][7]. Fluvial paleo-channels can be scaled from numerical equations based on grain size along with channel depth and width measurements and augmented by flow depth estimated from estimated dune bed form height from cross bedding set thickness using data of cross bedding set thickness [2,3,8]. Calculated parameters include mean bed form height, channel depth, channel belt width, channel width, paleoslope, boundary shear stress; Darcy-Weisbach friction factor, paleoflow velocity, and paleo discharge provide insight into basin analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%