2018
DOI: 10.1558/lst.34514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pair-work dynamics

Abstract: Adopting microgenetic analysis of languaging (Swain, 2006) in pair-work, this study aims to advance our understanding of learners' developmental processes for the complex concepts of Japanese particles ni/de. Two pairs whose learning outcomes differed were chosen, and their languaging was examined, focusing on "stronger" learners, the peers who showed more targetlike knowledge of particles on fill-in-the-blank pre-test than their partners. Both interaction patterns and quality of engagement appeared to have fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some instances, pushed to consider an alternative form or to provide an explanation, the learner who solves the LRE also gets to restructure their own knowledge. Masuda and Iwasaki (2018), for instance, showed how more proficient learners, with a stronger understanding of the Japanese particles “ni” and “de,” got to develop their conceptual knowledge of this target structure through languaging with less proficient classmates. Finally, we should not forget that HL learners may benefit from working with their L2 classmates in ways that cannot be captured through the discourse analysis of their interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some instances, pushed to consider an alternative form or to provide an explanation, the learner who solves the LRE also gets to restructure their own knowledge. Masuda and Iwasaki (2018), for instance, showed how more proficient learners, with a stronger understanding of the Japanese particles “ni” and “de,” got to develop their conceptual knowledge of this target structure through languaging with less proficient classmates. Finally, we should not forget that HL learners may benefit from working with their L2 classmates in ways that cannot be captured through the discourse analysis of their interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%