The way learners engage with tasks can crucially impact on learning opportunities and, therefore, more attention
is now being devoted to task affect. This study examines the attitudes of an underresearched population, child EFL learners,
towards a collaborative dictogloss task. Thirty-two Spanish EFL children (ages 11–12) completed the task in pairs and small groups
at their school, and an attitude questionnaire one week after. Results show that learners had a positive attitude towards L1 and
L2 writing, collaboration in the classroom, and the task itself, regardless of their grouping condition. Although these children
did not mention in their responses any explicit grammar gains as a result of the task, they considered the blend of the written
and oral mode and the opportunities for peer assistance to be beneficial. These results are encouraging for the promotion of
collaborative writing tasks with young learners in communicative contexts.
Collaborative writing has been traditionally studied in terms of language-related episodes (LREs), which have been
shown to be influenced by learner proficiency. Yet, the impact of collaboration on the written product has received less
attention, especially regarding child EFL learners. Our study analyzes the individual reconstructions produced by 30
Spanish-Basque EFL children (aged 11–12) before and after (T1 and T3) they completed a collaborative dictogloss (T2). From the
analysis of their LREs at T2, we predicted that certain areas (grammar and mechanics) could reflect more changes at T3 than
others. Moreover, we wanted to determine whether those changes were moderated by the learners’ and their partners’ proficiency at
T2: low (LP) or high (HP). Text-based and rubric measurements showed that only grammatical complexity improved in children’s
individual writing from T1 to T3. Regarding proficiency, LP children performed significantly worse than their HP counterparts at
T1 and T3 in most writing dimensions. Partner proficiency only influenced accuracy, and unexpectedly, working with an LP partner
did not appear to have a detrimental effect. Our findings stress the need to carry out longitudinal studies to further determine
the role of collaboration in L2 writing and knowledge development.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.