2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2017.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pain-related evoked potentials after intraepidermal electrical stimulation to Aδ and C fibers in patients with neuropathic pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the parameters for selective stimulation of Aδ fibers for recording EPs were based on the experimental protocol of our previous studies, which involves using trains of double pulses with an ISI of 10 ms at an intensity that was approximately twice the sensory threshold (Otsuru et al, 2010 ). The values of EP parameters recorded, such as the latency of N2 and P2, amplitudes of EPs (N2-P2), and sensory threshold, were within the range of the results of our and another group’s studies, which employed similar common parameters (Mouraux et al, 2010 , 2014 ; Omori et al, 2013 , 2017 ; Iwabe et al, 2014 ; Kodaira et al, 2014 ). EPs involving nociception are also substantially modulated by participant variables including vigilance, emotional state, alertness and especially, attention to the stimulus (in review, Legrain et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the parameters for selective stimulation of Aδ fibers for recording EPs were based on the experimental protocol of our previous studies, which involves using trains of double pulses with an ISI of 10 ms at an intensity that was approximately twice the sensory threshold (Otsuru et al, 2010 ). The values of EP parameters recorded, such as the latency of N2 and P2, amplitudes of EPs (N2-P2), and sensory threshold, were within the range of the results of our and another group’s studies, which employed similar common parameters (Mouraux et al, 2010 , 2014 ; Omori et al, 2013 , 2017 ; Iwabe et al, 2014 ; Kodaira et al, 2014 ). EPs involving nociception are also substantially modulated by participant variables including vigilance, emotional state, alertness and especially, attention to the stimulus (in review, Legrain et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The peak latencies of N2 and P2 were approximately 200 and 350 ms, respectively. In addition, we considered the peak latencies of N2 and P2 to be the latency period during 180–250 and 300–400 ms, respectively (Inui et al, 2002 ; Mouraux et al, 2010 ; Otsuru et al, 2010 ; Iwabe et al, 2014 ; Kodaira et al, 2014 ; Omori et al, 2017 ). Amplitudes of EPs were normalized to those recorded before tSMS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraepidermal electrical stimulation has also been described as a potential additional tool in detecting functional changes in Aδ‐fibers and C‐fibers in SFN, and in patients with neuropathic pain …”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…,108 and in patients with neuropathic pain 109. 2.6 | Imaging 2.6.1 | Peripheral nerve ultrasound Ultrasound (US) showed enlargement in cross-sectional area of the sural nerve in SFN patients with reduced IENFD, compared with body mass index matched healthy controls,110 indicating changes in structure or morphology of larger nerve fibers in SFN.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EEG recordings are particularly important in the diagnosis of epilepsy [3] and in brain computer interface (BCI) [4]. Several studies have shown that using EEG analysis can reveal pain responses from various stimulations such as heat or cold [5][6][7], electrical ones [8,9] and laser [10,11]. Components of pain-event related potential (pain-ERP) were used as signals to estimate pain perception of healthy subjects [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%