2003
DOI: 10.1080/02841850312331287709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pain in femoral arteriography: A double-blind, randomized, clinical study comparing safety and efficacy of the iso-osmolar iodixanol 270mgI/ml and the low-osmolar iomeprol 300 mgI/ml in 9 European centers

Abstract: The IOCM iodixanol caused significantly less frequent injection-associated pain and heat sensation than the LOCM iomeprol during femoral arteriography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Iodixanol has been shown to have a good tolerability and safety profile, particularly for intra-arterial injection. 39 42 Similarly, studies comparing intravenous iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar CM found lower incidence of discomfort, better safety and greater enhancement of the hepatic, aorta and portal vein 43 45 in patients receiving the iso-osmolar CM. Some clinical studies investigated the possible benefit of iso-osmolar CM in terms of the risk of AKI, with inconsistent results.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Iodixanol has been shown to have a good tolerability and safety profile, particularly for intra-arterial injection. 39 42 Similarly, studies comparing intravenous iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar CM found lower incidence of discomfort, better safety and greater enhancement of the hepatic, aorta and portal vein 43 45 in patients receiving the iso-osmolar CM. Some clinical studies investigated the possible benefit of iso-osmolar CM in terms of the risk of AKI, with inconsistent results.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%