2015
DOI: 10.5935/1806-0013.20150060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pain: evaluation of the fifth vital sign. A theoretical reflection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in practice, nurses are those who organize pain management. 31 Agreement on item additional assessments was for content validity (CVI=0.94), relevance (CVI=0.95), clarity (CVI=0.79), and scope of content (CVI=0.91). Clarity obtained a lower CVI because the participants understood that the position in which the item is assessed implies that it is part of the respiratory assessment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in practice, nurses are those who organize pain management. 31 Agreement on item additional assessments was for content validity (CVI=0.94), relevance (CVI=0.95), clarity (CVI=0.79), and scope of content (CVI=0.91). Clarity obtained a lower CVI because the participants understood that the position in which the item is assessed implies that it is part of the respiratory assessment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the nursing team has an important position which may influence its control (17) . Thus, pain assessment tools hold great relevance to support and guide nurses' actions, besides serving as a basis for diagnosis, prescription and assessment of obtained effectiveness, whether it is pharmacological or not (18) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding, which several studies sustain, is mainly because this is an interdisciplinary intervention and that there are difficulties in implementing other pain management measures, such as non--pharmacological interventions and pain assessments (which include initial assessment, planning, education, recording, and reassessment; Becker et al, 2017;Dequeker, Van Lancker, & Van Hecke, 2018;Gan et al, 2018). Pain assessment is recognized in the scientific literature as a challenge, pain education and intervention planning being the most neglected areas in clinical practice (Araujo & Romero, 2015;Medrzycka-Dabrowka, Dąbrowski, Gutysz-Wojnicka, Gawroska-Krzemińska, & Ozga, 2017). The results of this study also corroborate these findings since the overall mean scores for pain education and planning were the lowest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%