2020
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1783000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pain assessment in cerebral palsy: a systematic review of measurement properties and evaluation using the COSMIN checklist

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the 10 Arabic PROMs included in the review, none demonstrated sufficient properties for all psychometrics described in COMSIN guidelines. Our findings are consistent with the findings of previous systematic reviews that used COMSIN tools to assess the methodological quality of pediatric PROMs for participation [ 32 ], upper limb impairments [ 33 ], and pain [ 34 ]. All reviews concluded that the methodological quality of the PROMs reviewed did not reach sufficient psychometrics properties.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Among the 10 Arabic PROMs included in the review, none demonstrated sufficient properties for all psychometrics described in COMSIN guidelines. Our findings are consistent with the findings of previous systematic reviews that used COMSIN tools to assess the methodological quality of pediatric PROMs for participation [ 32 ], upper limb impairments [ 33 ], and pain [ 34 ]. All reviews concluded that the methodological quality of the PROMs reviewed did not reach sufficient psychometrics properties.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We found that the pediatric pain profile covers the described symptoms and signs of daily pain fairly adequately. This corresponds with Caraveu et al (2022), who found the pediatric pain profile (and r-FLACC) acceptable for the evaluation of pain in children with CP [ 49 ]. Only one previous study has provided partial descriptions of CCP in pain which included symptoms and signs, such as frequent nightly awakenings, irritability with feeding, facial grimacing, and crying with movement such as with diaper changes [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…17 Tools included in this review will not be limited by which level of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model they ascribe to, as long as they meet the definition of pain interference. 18 Several systematic reviews have previously been completed on observational pain assessment tools for those with cognitive impairment, [19][20][21][22] communication impairment, 23 intellectual/developmental disability, 10,24,25 and dementia. [26][27][28][29][30] However, these studies have primarily focused on acute and post-surgical pain, and on the domains of pain intensity, pain behaviour, and pain frequency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%