MILCOM 2015 - 2015 IEEE Military Communications Conference 2015
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2015.7357607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Packet error rate analysis of IM/DD systems for ultraviolet scattering communications

Abstract: Ultraviolet scattering communication has the capability of none-line-of-sight transmission, but it is limited by low receiving power and data communication rate. In this paper, digital pulse interval modulation (DPIM) and dual head pulse interval modulation (DHPIM), which have variable intensity modulation order and no requirement for symbol synchronization, along with on-off keying (OOK) modulation and pulseposition modulation (PPM) are analyzed with packet error rates for ultraviolet scattering communication… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the previous papers dealing with NLOS optical communication, modulations such as on-off-keying (OOK), pulse position modulation (PPM), dual-head pulse interval modulation (DH-PIM), frequency-shift keying (FSK), spectral amplitude coding (SAC), and others were used. The choice of the DPIM modulation is quite justified, since it was shown, for example, in [29] that this type of communication modulation potentially allows more symbols to be transmitted per unit time than, for example, OOK.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the previous papers dealing with NLOS optical communication, modulations such as on-off-keying (OOK), pulse position modulation (PPM), dual-head pulse interval modulation (DH-PIM), frequency-shift keying (FSK), spectral amplitude coding (SAC), and others were used. The choice of the DPIM modulation is quite justified, since it was shown, for example, in [29] that this type of communication modulation potentially allows more symbols to be transmitted per unit time than, for example, OOK.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the beginning of the 21st Century, the development of small-sized laser sources and highly sensitive optical receivers has caused a sharp growth in the interest of specialists in studying the feasibility of NLOS wireless optical communications [24]. We consider the papers [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] to be the most-important from the viewpoint of developing the theory and experimental studies of NLOS communication feasibility. As a part of the work on terrestrial NLOS communications in the open atmosphere, the following most-important results were obtained: (1) methods for statistical simulation of the impulse response of a communication channel have been developed; (2) analytical equations have been proposed for the single scattered part of the impulse response; (3) interpolation equations have been proposed for the impulse response and the path loss; (4) the received signal duration as a function of a wide range of optical-geometric conditions has been assessed; (5) equations have been proposed for calculating the bit error rate (BER), symbol error rate (SER), and package error rate (PER) for a wide range of modulation methods; (6) the dependence of the BER, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and maximum data rate on a wide range of optical and geometric conditions and source parameters for the main information encoding methods has been assessed; (7) the effect of turbulence on the path loss under day and night conditions has been evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each control path includes a detector and filter connected in series. As a detector, the conditioner model can contain various types of demodulators depending on the type of modulation used at the physical level: on-off keying (OOK), or pulse-position modulation (PPM); in addition, digital pulse interval modulation (DPIM and dual-head DPIM, DH-DPIM), which do not require external synchronization of the transmitter and receiver [18][19][20][21][22][23] y2y3 , where y1 is the level number, y2 is the number of the unit to which the signal belongs; y3 is the signal identifier. The identifier y3 can take the following alphabetic and numerical designations: 1 -input signal of the unit, 2 -output, y -control signal CU, f -CPs of FFR circuit, b -CPs of FBR circuit.…”
Section: The Hierarchical Model For the Manet Information Signal Conditioning With Ultraviolet Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital pulse interval modulation (DPIM) can modulate the same number of bits per symbol as an even-order PPM but does not require symbol synchronization. It is also important that DPIM uses fewer time slots per symbol than PPM and thus requires less bandwidth [15][16][17][18][19][20]. As PPM, DPIM has higher energy efficiency than OOK.…”
Section: Uv Nlos Channel Bandwidth Models Using Various Modulatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows the time diagrams of the 4-position pulse modulations PPM and DPIM with the number of guard intervals n = 1. The same expression determines the average number of signal photons accumulated during the symbol interval for PPM and DPIM [15] …”
Section: Uv Nlos Channel Bandwidth Models Using Various Modulatimentioning
confidence: 99%