“…The terms ‘Pacinian neuroma’, ‘Pacinian hypertrophy’, and ‘Pacinian hyperplasia’ have been used interchangeably in the past and in some recent articles, regardless of the presence or absence of trauma, which is misleading (Cho et al., 2012; Jiménez et al., 2017; Kenmochi et al., 2006; Lang-Stevenson, 1984; Mahipathy et al., 2015; Narayanamurthy et al., 2005; Patterson, 1956; Rhode and Jennings, 1975; Schuler and Adamson, 1978; Zanardi et al., 2011). Other authors have also noted this inconsistent and occasionally confusing terminology (Jiménez et al., 2017; Kuhn et al., 1988). To avoid misdiagnosis and mislabelling in the future, the pathological processes involving Pacinian corpuscles should be labelled either as Pacinian corpuscle hyperplasia (or neuroma, if a traumatic aetiology is involved) or as PCNF, according to the specific histological findings.…”