P3-like signatures of temporal predictions: a computational EEG study

Abstract

Many cognitive processes, ranging from perception to action, depend on the ability to predict the timing of forthcoming events. Yet, how the brain uses predictive models in the temporal domain is still an unsolved question. In previous work, we began to explore the neural correlates of temporal predictions by using a computational approach in which an ideal Bayesian observer learned the temporal probabilities of target onsets in a simple reaction time task. Because the task was specifically designed to disambiguate updating of predictive models and surprise, changes in temporal probabilities were explicitly cued. However, in the real world, we are usually incidentally exposed to changes in the statistics of the environment.Here, we thus aimed to further investigate the electroencephalographic (EEG) correlates of Bayesian belief updating and surprise associated with incidental learning of temporal probabilities. In line with our previous EEG study, results showed distinct P3-like modulations for updating and surprise. While surprise was indexed by an early fronto-central P3-like modulation, updating was associated with a later and more posterior P3 modulation.Moreover, updating was associated with a P2-like potential at centro-parietal electrodes, likely capturing integration processes between prior beliefs and likelihood of the observed event.These findings support previous evidence of trial-by-trial variability of P3 amplitudes as an index of dissociable inferential processes. Coupled with our previous findings, the present study strongly bolsters the view of the P3 as a key brain signature of temporal Bayesian inference. Data and scripts are shared on OSF: osf.io/sdy8j/

Unifying temporal preparation: The temporal preparation task (TEP-Task)

“…The time interval between warning and target is referred to as the "foreperiod". When various foreperiods are randomly intermixed across trials, each with an equal a-priori probability of appearing, a common finding is that reaction times (RTs) decrease at longer foreperiod trials (Coull, 2009;Niemi & Näätänen, 1981;Visalli et al, 2023). This phenomenon, termed the foreperiod effect, is formalized by the hazard function, i.e., the conditional probability that an event will occur given that is has not occurred yet (Herbst, Fiedler, & Obleser, 2018;Janssen & Shadlen, 2005;Visalli et al, 2019;2021).…”