2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2023.102758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surprise and novelty in the brain

Alireza Modirshanechi,
Sophia Becker,
Johanni Brea
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By doing so we show that although several variables interact in the process of curiosity and creativity, as alluded to in the target article, novelty-seeking best explains the underlying basis of human curiosity and creativity. Interestingly, our assumption is supported by recent computational evidence showing that when exploring complex environments, novelty-seeking is the most probable model of human behavior, outperforming seeking information-gain or surprise (Modirshanechi, Becker, Brea, & Gerstner, 2023). We encourage future research to empirically test whether different types of novelty commonly guide curiosity and creativity.…”
Section: R24 Learningsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…By doing so we show that although several variables interact in the process of curiosity and creativity, as alluded to in the target article, novelty-seeking best explains the underlying basis of human curiosity and creativity. Interestingly, our assumption is supported by recent computational evidence showing that when exploring complex environments, novelty-seeking is the most probable model of human behavior, outperforming seeking information-gain or surprise (Modirshanechi, Becker, Brea, & Gerstner, 2023). We encourage future research to empirically test whether different types of novelty commonly guide curiosity and creativity.…”
Section: R24 Learningsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Some count-based models compute the state familiarity with simpler functions that, for example, consider absolute counts rather than state frequencies [18,20,22,23] or only consider binary counts [14,46]. Since these models can all be reformulated in terms of the empirical frequency p [24,32], we focus on frequency-based novelty models as in Eq. 1 for the rest of the manuscript.…”
Section: Count-based Novelty Models Fail To Account For Similarity Mo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the negative logarithm is a standard choice of nonlinearity in the novelty literature [24,47]. The combination of empirical count-based frequency (Eq.…”
Section: Count-based Novelty Models Fail To Account For Similarity Mo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, these shared mechanisms initiate downstream processing of the "novel" stimulus or association (Ivancovsky et al). However, although Ivancovsky et al use "novelty" as a general notion, distinct intrinsic motivations contributing to curiosity (e.g., novelty, surprise, information gain) are mathematically well-defined (Barto et al, 2013;Modirshanechi et al, 2022), have different neural signatures (Akiti et al, 2022;Morrens et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2021;, and are triggered by different statistical regularities of the task or environment (Maheu et al, 2019) (see Modirshanechi et al, 2023a, for a review). For example, novelty signals are triggered by unfamiliar stimuli and situations, both when the unfamiliarity is expected and when it is unexpected (Homann et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%