2011
DOI: 10.1016/s1262-3636(11)70828-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P202 - La neuropathie diabétique évaluée par le score DN4 : à propos de 30 cas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When specific complications are considered, we can notice that the rate of neuropathy observed in our study is higher than the rate of 45% reported by Ouerdane et al [11] but less high than the rate of 80% observed by Fendi et al [12] evaluating diabetic neuropathy by the DN4 score. Our rate of neuropathy is conform to results reported by the Diabcare Africa Study with rate of neuropathy ranging from 39.19% to 63.70% in different Africa regions [13].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…When specific complications are considered, we can notice that the rate of neuropathy observed in our study is higher than the rate of 45% reported by Ouerdane et al [11] but less high than the rate of 80% observed by Fendi et al [12] evaluating diabetic neuropathy by the DN4 score. Our rate of neuropathy is conform to results reported by the Diabcare Africa Study with rate of neuropathy ranging from 39.19% to 63.70% in different Africa regions [13].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Mean age of patients of 56.22±5.80 years observed in our study is higher to what had been reported by Belkhadir et al and 52 years reported by Touré in Mali but lower than 62 years reported in France. [7][8][9] When specific complications are considered, we can notice that the rate of neuropathy observed in our study is higher than the rate of 45% reported by Ouerdane et al but less high than the rate of 80% observed by Fendi et al 10,11 Investigation of retinopathy revealed a rate of 57.33% which is higher than the rate of 47.5% reported by Khadraoui et al 12 In the 201 patients included in our study, only 43 (21.39%) were investigated for retinopathy. This confirms the observation of Rosenberg et al who reported in their study that only 35% of studied patients were referred for eye exam showing that screening guidelines for diabetic retinopathy are not often respected by physician.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%