2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

p16 Expression Is Not a Surrogate Marker for High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection in Periocular Sebaceous Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
18
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, prior efforts have produced conflicting results on the relationship between OA sebaceous carcinoma and HPV infection. Some studies (11,44,46) failed to confirm any relationship with HPV infection across 38 patient tumors, and a study in which a single HPV-positive case was identified by PCR for HPV DNA failed to confirm transcriptionally active HPV infection by in situ hybridization (48). These differences are partially attributable to the application of differing technologies for HPV detection, including in situ hybridization for HPV DNA or RNA or PCR for HPV DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, prior efforts have produced conflicting results on the relationship between OA sebaceous carcinoma and HPV infection. Some studies (11,44,46) failed to confirm any relationship with HPV infection across 38 patient tumors, and a study in which a single HPV-positive case was identified by PCR for HPV DNA failed to confirm transcriptionally active HPV infection by in situ hybridization (48). These differences are partially attributable to the application of differing technologies for HPV detection, including in situ hybridization for HPV DNA or RNA or PCR for HPV DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is unclear whether these latter TP53-positive tumors actually carried a somatic TP53 mutation. Of note, detection of p16 protein expression-typically a surrogate for HPV positivity in HPV-driven tumors-has not been shown to predict HPV infection in prior studies on OA sebaceous carcinoma (48). This is likely because HPV-negative OA sebaceous carcinomas harbor a high frequency inactivating RB1 mutations, and RB1 inactivation itself typically correlates with elevated levels of p16 protein expression (49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The varied origin of this neoplasm highlights the importance of considering sebaceous carcinoma regardless of the anatomical location [ 16 ]. Several papers have been published on the relationship between sebaceous cancer and human papillomavirus [ 17 , 18 ]. Overexpression of p53 is involved in the carcinogenesis of this tumor, and is a risk factor suggesting a poor prognosis [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Whereas immunohistochemical techniques for expression of adipophilin, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), BerEP4 and several other markers are well established in the differential diagnosis of sebaceous gland tumors, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] our information about the exact cellular architecture of these lesions and even of the normal sebaceous gland is still scarce. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Whereas immunohistochemical techniques for expression of adipophilin, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), BerEP4 and several other markers are well established in the differential diagnosis of sebaceous gland tumors, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] our information about the exact cellular architecture of these lesions and even of the normal sebaceous gland is still scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sebaceous tumors are uncommon adnexal tumors. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Whereas immunohistochemical techniques for expression of adipophilin, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), BerEP4 and several other markers are well established in the differential diagnosis of sebaceous gland tumors, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] our information about the exact cellular architecture of these lesions and even of the normal sebaceous gland is still scarce. [19][20][21][22] Furthermore, the histogenesis of extraocular sebaceous carcinomas is, in contrast to ocular sebaceous carcinomas, still unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%