2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.05.569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P1‐328: Discriminative Validity of the Fcsrt: Verbal and Visual Versions in a Cohort of Patients With Mild Alzheimer Disease and Controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The few studies comparing these versions usually demonstrated that the pictoric FCSRT with IR (hereafter called pFCSRT-IR) have higher scores when compared with the version of FCSRT with words and without IR (Slachevsky et al, 2014(Slachevsky et al, , 2018Zimmerman et al, 2015). However, in a sample of healthy elderly individuals, the moderate and positive correlation between the scores of the two versions was highlighted (Zimmerman et al, 2015); as well as its similar diagnostic accuracy for AD patients (Delgado et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few studies comparing these versions usually demonstrated that the pictoric FCSRT with IR (hereafter called pFCSRT-IR) have higher scores when compared with the version of FCSRT with words and without IR (Slachevsky et al, 2014(Slachevsky et al, , 2018Zimmerman et al, 2015). However, in a sample of healthy elderly individuals, the moderate and positive correlation between the scores of the two versions was highlighted (Zimmerman et al, 2015); as well as its similar diagnostic accuracy for AD patients (Delgado et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%