2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ozone risk assessment is affected by nutrient availability: Evidence from a simulation experiment under free air controlled exposure (FACE)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(123 reference statements)
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modelling studies estimated POD1 values to be 2-30 mmol m −2 in Southern Europe (Anav et al, 2016;Sicard et al, 2016a). In field conditions in Italy, POD1 values were reported to be around 28-50 mmol m −2 for poplars (Hoshika et al, 2018b;Zhang et al, 2018) and 4-19 mmol m −2 for oaks (Hoshika et al, 2018a).…”
Section: Ozone Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Modelling studies estimated POD1 values to be 2-30 mmol m −2 in Southern Europe (Anav et al, 2016;Sicard et al, 2016a). In field conditions in Italy, POD1 values were reported to be around 28-50 mmol m −2 for poplars (Hoshika et al, 2018b;Zhang et al, 2018) and 4-19 mmol m −2 for oaks (Hoshika et al, 2018a).…”
Section: Ozone Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…86% of the sites where the SWC effect was considered in the POD1 calculation) showed POD1 values exceeding the CLs corresponding to a 5% biomass reduction. Such CLs were calculated under open-air experimental conditions (POD1 = 5.0 to 8.8 mmol m −2 for oaks in Hoshika et al, 2018a; POD1 = 5.1 mmol m −2 for poplars in Zhang et al, 2018) and open-top chamber experiments (POD1 = 6.3 mmol m −2 for beech and birch, POD1 = 23.8 mmol m −2 for needle leaf trees, and POD1 = 26.3 mmol m −2 for Aleppo pine, holm oak and Norway spruce in Büker et al, 2015). Generally, we found a good agreement between values of the same metric accumulated over different time windows (Fig.…”
Section: Ozone Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steady-state A is typically measured within 2-5 min from changing conditions [61,62], because longer measurement times would affect the steady-state activation of Rubisco and introduce errors [61]. Parameterizing gs is a pillar of flux-based O 3 risk assessment for vegetation [63,64]. Therefore, we recommend separate recordings i.e., first for steady-state A and then for steady-state gs, especially when leaves are exposed to O 3 .…”
Section: Steady-state and Dynamic Responses Of Leaf-level Gas Exchange (Sun/shade)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, [O 3 ] i represents the hourly average O 3 concentration during the daytime hours between 8:00 and 20:00 and n is the number of hours in the growing seasons for forest trees and crops [15,27].…”
Section: Vegetation Health Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better estimate the risk assessment of O 3 , several indices have been suggested by previous studies for human (SOMO35: annual sum of maximum daily 8-h ozone means over 35 ppb), forest trees and vegetation/crops (AOT40: the accumulated exposure over an hourly threshold of 40 ppb during daylight hours between 8:00 and 20:00 in the growing seasons) [3,14,15]. To date, numerous studies have been carried out in Tehran investigating various issues of ambient air pollution [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%