Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
Öğrenme Güçlüğü Ve Özel Yetenek 2017
DOI: 10.14527/9786053188049.08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Özel yeteneklilerin özellikleri ve tanılanması

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The other important issue for the giftedness literature is perspectives related to identification of gifted students. Although there are debates on timing and structure of identification of gifted children, it can be said that researchers mostly agree on multifaceted and multidimensional assessment of giftedness (Ayas & Kirişçi, 2017;Hoctor, 2013;Johnsen, 2009; National Association for Gifted Children [NAGC], 2006;Sak, 2017;Schroth & Helfer, 2008). In this approach, it is essential to use an evaluation system that combines multiple approaches such as teacher and parent observations, child's products, portfolios, verbal and nonverbal intelligence tests, interest tests and interviews (Ayas & Kirişci, 2017;Bildiren, 2019;Hoctor, 2013;Johnsen, 2009;NAGC, 2006;Sak, 2017;Schroth & Helfer, 2008).…”
Section: Tartışma Ve Sonuçmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The other important issue for the giftedness literature is perspectives related to identification of gifted students. Although there are debates on timing and structure of identification of gifted children, it can be said that researchers mostly agree on multifaceted and multidimensional assessment of giftedness (Ayas & Kirişçi, 2017;Hoctor, 2013;Johnsen, 2009; National Association for Gifted Children [NAGC], 2006;Sak, 2017;Schroth & Helfer, 2008). In this approach, it is essential to use an evaluation system that combines multiple approaches such as teacher and parent observations, child's products, portfolios, verbal and nonverbal intelligence tests, interest tests and interviews (Ayas & Kirişci, 2017;Bildiren, 2019;Hoctor, 2013;Johnsen, 2009;NAGC, 2006;Sak, 2017;Schroth & Helfer, 2008).…”
Section: Tartışma Ve Sonuçmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu yaklaşımda, olabildiğince fazla kaynaktan alınan verilere göre değerlendirmelerin yapılması esastır. Öğretmen ve anne baba gözlemleri, çocuğun ürünleri, portfolyo dosyaları, sözel ve sözel olmayan zekâ testleri, ilgi testleri ve görüşmeler gibi birden fazla yaklaşımın birleştirildiği bir değerlendirme sisteminin kullanılması önerilmektedir (Ayas & Kirişçi, 2017;Bildiren, 2019;Hoctor, 2013;Johnsen, 2009;NAGC, 2006;Sak, 2017;Schroth & Helfer, 2008). Çoklu değerlendirmede, sistematik bir şekilde toplanan veriler birleştirilmekte ve kararlar kapsamlı bir sisteme dayalı bir biçimde alınmaktadır.…”
unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation