2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxygenated functionalities enriched MWCNTs decorated with silica coated spinel ferrite – A nanocomposite for potentially rapid and efficient de-colorization of aquatic environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparing the treatment effects of SAEF and DEF, we find that the TC conversion efficiency of SAEF is 5.07% lower than that of DEF, the COD removal rate of SAEF and DEF was nearly the same, but the sludges output and energy consumption of DEF were 3.23 times and 1.15 times of SAEF, respectively. In the electro-Fenton reaction system, Fe 2+ was a necessary condition for catalyzing H2O2 to produce OH [44]. Compared with DC, By comparing the treatment effects of SAEF and DEF, we find that the TC conversion efficiency of SAEF is 5.07% lower than that of DEF, the COD removal rate of SAEF and DEF was nearly the same, but the sludges output and energy consumption of DEF were 3.23 times and 1.15 times of SAEF, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison Of Treatment Effects Among Saef Def and Saccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing the treatment effects of SAEF and DEF, we find that the TC conversion efficiency of SAEF is 5.07% lower than that of DEF, the COD removal rate of SAEF and DEF was nearly the same, but the sludges output and energy consumption of DEF were 3.23 times and 1.15 times of SAEF, respectively. In the electro-Fenton reaction system, Fe 2+ was a necessary condition for catalyzing H2O2 to produce OH [44]. Compared with DC, By comparing the treatment effects of SAEF and DEF, we find that the TC conversion efficiency of SAEF is 5.07% lower than that of DEF, the COD removal rate of SAEF and DEF was nearly the same, but the sludges output and energy consumption of DEF were 3.23 times and 1.15 times of SAEF, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison Of Treatment Effects Among Saef Def and Saccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…towards MB and celestine blue of 204 mg g −1 (pH: 5.6, T: 323 K) and 714 mg g −1 (pH: 5.5, T: 293 K), respectively. [209] Magnetic Zeolites: Zeolites are porous crystalline aluminosilicates (natural or synthetic) with TO 4 tetrahedral units (T = Si, Al). These materials have many applications in the adsorptive treatment of water.…”
Section: Magnet-responsive Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 10–15% of dyes are lost during their processing operations. Most dyes, and especially azo-dyes, are toxic to biota [ 4 , 5 ]. Excessive dye concentrations in aquatic system can cause eutrophication, which is harmful for both aquatic plants and animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%