2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7ob01212h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxidative coupling of Michael acceptors with aryl nucleophiles produced through rhodium-catalyzed C–C bond activation

Abstract: Utilizing rhodium catalysis, aryl nucleophiles generated via carbon-carbon single bond activation successfully undergo oxidative coupling with Michael acceptors. The reaction scope encompasses a broad range of nucleophiles generated from quinolinyl ketones as well as a series of electron deficient terminal alkenes, illustrating the broad potential of intersecting carbon-carbon bond activation with synthetically useful coupling methodologies. The demonstrated oxidative coupling produces a range of cinnamyl deri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…C NMR (CDCl 3 , 101 MHz): δ 167.6, 145.0, 134.6, 130.4, 129.0, 128.2, 117.9, 51.8.Spectroscopic data were in agreement with literature values 2. …”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…C NMR (CDCl 3 , 101 MHz): δ 167.6, 145.0, 134.6, 130.4, 129.0, 128.2, 117.9, 51.8.Spectroscopic data were in agreement with literature values 2. …”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Quinolinyl ketones are regarded as a versatile directing group by the cooperation of transition metal catalysts for activating the organic transformation [77][78][79][80][81][82]. A variety of 2-aminobenzophenone 4 were subjected to react with propionaldehyde 2a in the optimized reaction condition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The product was obtained as a white solid (706 mg, 54% yield) following silica gel column chromatography with hexanes/EtOAc (98/2). The spectroscopic data were in accordance with those previously published in the literature: 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 7.61 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H), 7.46–7.43 (m, 3H), 6.81 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 3.10 (q, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.39 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%